From: Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>
To: mason@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, cem@kernel.org,
david@fromorbit.com, jack@suse.cz, djwong@kernel.org,
josef@toxicpanda.com, hch@lst.de, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
tz2294@columbia.edu, brauner@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 07/15] xfs: test for reflink after the dio write checks
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 20:02:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261112010229.51029-8-mason@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112010229.51029-1-mason@kernel.org>
A direct write that is not block aligned can expose stale disk contents
on XFS if it races with the first clone of the file.
xfs_file_dio_write_unaligned() falls back to buffered I/O if the file is
reflinked, and tests for that right after it takes the iolock. But
xfs_file_write_checks() runs after the test and can drop the iolock, for
example if S_NOSEC is not set. A clone can run in that gap:
direct write clone
============ =====
takes the iolock shared
sees that the file is not reflinked
drops the iolock
shares the blocks
takes the iolock exclusive
writes a part of a new COW block
maps the whole block into the file
/* the rest was never written */
The fix used here is to move the test after xfs_file_write_checks().
Fixes: ed1128c2d0c8 ("xfs: reduce exclusive locking on unaligned dio")
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
Notes:
v7->v8:
- No change.
v6->v7:
- No change.
fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index 8ee88910b487..d888470d092a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -877,9 +877,15 @@ xfs_file_dio_write_unaligned(
if (ret)
return ret;
+ ret = xfs_file_write_checks(iocb, from, &iolock, NULL);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
/*
* We can't properly handle unaligned direct I/O to reflink files yet,
- * as we can't unshare a partial block.
+ * as we can't unshare a partial block. xfs_file_write_checks() can
+ * drop the iolock and take it again, and the file can be reflinked in
+ * between, so test for that only now.
*/
if (xfs_is_cow_inode(ip)) {
trace_xfs_reflink_bounce_dio_write(iocb, from);
@@ -887,10 +893,6 @@ xfs_file_dio_write_unaligned(
goto out_unlock;
}
- ret = xfs_file_write_checks(iocb, from, &iolock, NULL);
- if (ret)
- goto out_unlock;
-
/*
* If we are doing exclusive unaligned I/O, this must be the only I/O
* in-flight. Otherwise we risk data corruption due to unwritten extent
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 1:02 [PATCH v8 00/15] reflink and atomic write bugs Chris Mason
2026-11-12 1:02 ` [PATCH v8 01/15] xfs: don't skip the flush before shifting extents Chris Mason
2026-11-12 1:02 ` [PATCH v8 02/15] xfs: flush the shifted range before changing the file Chris Mason
2026-11-12 1:02 ` [PATCH v8 03/15] xfs: don't change the block map under a dirty folio Chris Mason
2026-11-12 1:02 ` [PATCH v8 04/15] iomap: don't punch delalloc under a dirty EOF block Chris Mason
2026-11-12 1:02 ` [PATCH v8 05/15] fs: validate atomic writes after O_APPEND and limits Chris Mason
2026-11-12 1:02 ` [PATCH v8 06/15] xfs: recheck direct write alignment after write checks Chris Mason
2026-11-12 1:02 ` Chris Mason [this message]
2026-11-12 1:02 ` [PATCH v8 08/15] xfs: refuse writes to files racing with realtime inode flag changes Chris Mason
2026-11-12 1:02 ` [PATCH v8 09/15] xfs: test for always COW after the dio write checks Chris Mason
2026-11-12 1:02 ` [PATCH v8 10/15] xfs: refuse fallocate racing with realtime flag changes Chris Mason
2026-11-12 1:02 ` [PATCH v8 11/15] xfs: restart faults " Chris Mason
2026-11-12 13:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-12 1:02 ` [PATCH v8 12/15] xfs: test for an extsize hint again under the ILOCK Chris Mason
2026-11-12 13:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-12 1:02 ` [PATCH v8 13/15] xfs: resample the extsize hint after taking " Chris Mason
2026-11-12 13:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-12 13:49 ` Chris Mason
2026-11-12 1:02 ` [PATCH v8 14/15] xfs: resample the COW extsize hint after cycling ILOCK Chris Mason
2026-11-12 13:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-12 1:02 ` [PATCH v8 15/15] xfs: don't enable DAX on zoned inodes Chris Mason
2026-11-12 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261112010229.51029-8-mason@kernel.org \
--to=mason@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=tz2294@columbia.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.