[to-be-updated] mm-mglru-run-aging-when-one-type-has-no-populatable-folios.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm/mglru: run aging when one type has no populatable folios
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-mglru-run-aging-when-one-type-has-no-populatable-folios.patch

This patch was dropped because an updated version will be issued

------------------------------------------------------
From: "Barry Song (Xiaomi)" <baohua@kernel.org>
Subject: mm/mglru: run aging when one type has no populatable folios
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 07:25:58 +0800

We may have scan budget remaining for anon or file
but no folios in populatable generations to scan.
In this case, `scan_folios()` may waste time scanning
that type while the other type still has populatable
folios.

Run aging in this case to make more folios
populatable. This also helps respect the scan budget
distribution determined by swappiness.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20261111232603.9934-12-baohua@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) <baohua@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <baoquan.he@linux.dev>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: <hui.zhu@linux.dev>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Cc: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@gmail.com>
Cc: Liam R. Howlett <liam@infradead.org>
Cc: wang lian <lianux.mm@gmail.com>
Cc: <liuxiang.277@bytedance.com>
Cc: <lyugaofei@xiaomi.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>
Cc: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: wangzicheng <wangzicheng@honor.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>
Cc: Bo Zhang <zhangbo56@xiaomi.com>
Cc: Hui Zhu <zhuhui@kylinos.cn>
Cc: Siddharth Chintamaneni <sidchintamaneni@gmail.com>
---

 mm/vmscan.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-mglru-run-aging-when-one-type-has-no-populatable-folios
+++ a/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -5111,7 +5111,8 @@ static bool lru_gen_imbalanced(struct lr
 }
 
 static bool should_run_aging(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long max_seq,
-			     struct scan_control *sc, int swappiness)
+			     struct scan_control *sc, int swappiness,
+			     bool no_populatable)
 {
 	DEFINE_MIN_SEQ(lruvec);
 
@@ -5123,6 +5124,13 @@ static bool should_run_aging(struct lruv
 	if (sc->priority == DEF_PRIORITY)
 		return false;
 
+	/*
+	 * Run aging if scan budget remains but no folios
+	 * in populatable generations are available to scan.
+	 */
+	if (no_populatable)
+		return true;
+
 	/* better to run aging even though eviction is still possible */
 	if (evictable_min_seq(min_seq, swappiness) + MIN_NR_GENS == max_seq)
 		return true;
@@ -5227,20 +5235,17 @@ static bool try_to_shrink_lruvec(struct
 	lru_gen_prepare_scan(lruvec, sc, memcg, swappiness, nr);
 
 	while (nr[LRU_GEN_ANON] > 0 || nr[LRU_GEN_FILE] > 0) {
+		unsigned long orig_file, orig_anon;
 		DEFINE_MAX_SEQ(lruvec);
+		bool no_populatable;
 
 		if (mem_cgroup_below_min(sc->target_mem_cgroup, memcg)) {
 			need_rotate = true;
 			break;
 		}
 
-		if (should_run_aging(lruvec, max_seq, sc, swappiness)) {
-			trace_mm_mglru_aging(lruvec, sc, swappiness);
-			if (try_to_inc_max_seq(lruvec, max_seq, swappiness, false))
-				need_rotate = true;
-			should_age = true;
-		}
-
+		orig_anon = nr[LRU_GEN_ANON];
+		orig_file = nr[LRU_GEN_FILE];
 		if (!evict_folio_lists(nr, lruvec, sc, swappiness, MIN_LRU_BATCH))
 			break;
 
@@ -5254,6 +5259,15 @@ static bool try_to_shrink_lruvec(struct
 		if (root_reclaim(sc) && should_age)
 			break;
 
+		no_populatable = (nr[LRU_GEN_ANON] && nr[LRU_GEN_ANON] == orig_anon) ||
+				 (nr[LRU_GEN_FILE] && nr[LRU_GEN_FILE] == orig_file);
+		if (should_run_aging(lruvec, max_seq, sc, swappiness, no_populatable)) {
+			trace_mm_mglru_aging(lruvec, sc, swappiness);
+			if (try_to_inc_max_seq(lruvec, max_seq, swappiness, false))
+				need_rotate = true;
+			should_age = true;
+		}
+
 		cond_resched();
 	}
 
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from baohua@kernel.org are

arm64-vmalloc-allow-arch_vmap_pte_range_map_size-to-batch-multiple-cont_pte.patch
mm-vmalloc-extend-page-table-walk-to-support-larger-page_shift-sizes-and-eliminate-page-table-rewalk.patch
mm-vmalloc-map-contiguous-pages-in-batches-for-vmap-if-possible.patch
mm-vmalloc-align-vm_area-so-vmap-can-batch-mappings.patch
mm-mglru-restrict-eviction-accounting-to-eligible-zones.patch
mm-mglru-reduce-lru-lock-contention-by-shrinking-folio-batches-in-inc_min_seq.patch
mm-mglru-make-swappiness=1-file-reclaim-more-aggressive.patch