From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794694239; b=eo8cAuJ3Ogaq9j1poViKjdEWpTuD77eaCt0NENPURaKaeAF/k7+Mp3GyYNS0fbJt1XvB Pny7xTD0O3wg60MOFv3eQdWMDNJlaLCPsZ27u2/Xf2f2PCWvq3lBAP/fXwjF/GWTkMVZg oNHsAcCSGv/8zqvJEX4+cirBiCngke08RqRo1Q4I8JuYjdV0arIjfI8I6CQWLrPHQ9A2g 9du/eeBDBSFR9u0OQCep3a7Fe7CFsW5F6rNuQKjfegb9od/Pu1w43svxyiuXdKm1f1unV O/ZToi6Ie9D4wtVTCvz6RNLA/1y/MlBFIyqbXOhSGA96vHzOvO/xYJvh5vGxQKbWD1g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794694239; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:To:From:Subject:Message-Id; bh=dUZOnymS43+2IiO2HsZeXIW+XMqUYo4Se5s+Hgd5w/Y=; b=tTfmm37NXcTJf2FAVwR9VAor6rzU4+G8qY6K3QZFwaxo4qkSgtEo25I8pm2MCmGQ16ee rYVNeg/idpHI+zcY4aR2DKeqM/axRBdnlZuFlnKx8B/SG0lArPfWfPcCCcjGvs55LScJj 3YOH5V/5F0kH9yoAoWraddYwE5OJXldcRyt2WyXmLyzpDdILQ3WZQWW5/Xz4UYkdoe8FE LTWk91FQe93V/0tpjLpwkfb0yKF8RZK4LC4jn0p7hrwVMtXQQgOhAbs4QNH/DapetUDQr KBTfsk10b8eSS+UuaOQXWpfLP4dhTcB6pt1iNOFG9NlqVvFbnppd6SH+N4pA1OPEgNA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=J6yCRyAA; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BD80606A336 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2026 22:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=korg header.b=J6yCRyAA Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92F161F000C5; Sat, 14 Nov 2026 22:10:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1794694238; bh=dUZOnymS43+2IiO2HsZeXIW+XMqUYo4Se5s+Hgd5w/Y=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=J6yCRyAARQxdVXwbMmHOg1uhc4HzZVELUcgkQ2yRq+PzZMQOM7HylMBsmq4A2R+0V ErJhdv8ac2Lt6Nm2TgU+fBBfBM5lVDCP+KbwrIoA5//48KKSuOgC1Dt9PA7ns8RIB2 HQKnx+ZiCqNyJiIe+OTVHiI8QF3NTli1luqYGU18= Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 14:10:38 -0800 To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,kasong@tencent.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org From: Andrew Morton Subject: + mm-mglru-lift-the-forced-protection-of-reclaimer.patch added to mm-new branch Message-Id: <20261114221038.92F161F000C5@smtp.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list The patch titled Subject: mm/mglru: lift the forced protection of reclaimer has been added to the -mm mm-new branch. Its filename is mm-mglru-lift-the-forced-protection-of-reclaimer.patch This patch will shortly appear at https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/mm-mglru-lift-the-forced-protection-of-reclaimer.patch This patch will later appear in the mm-new branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm Note, mm-new is a provisional staging ground for work-in-progress patches, and acceptance into mm-new is a notification for others take notice and to finish up reviews. Please do not hesitate to respond to review feedback and post updated versions to replace or incrementally fixup patches in mm-new. The mm-new branch of mm.git is not included in linux-next If a few days of testing in mm-new is successful, the patch will me moved into mm.git's mm-unstable branch, which is included in linux-next Before you just go and hit "reply", please: a) Consider who else should be cc'ed b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm and is updated there most days ------------------------------------------------------ From: Kairui Song Subject: mm/mglru: lift the forced protection of reclaimer Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2026 04:07:51 +0800 When a type is drained down to MIN_NR_GENS gens, the reclaimer will fail to make any progress on that type without aging. However aging comes with a cost, and it will take time to finish. Even if we do aging more proactively, when under great pressure, gens will still be drained very fast so the new gens produced by aging can't catch up with the consumption. With MIN_NR_GENS setting blocking the reclaim, we will run into OOM. This OOM can be reproduced by the previous test program [1] used for fixing another aging problem [2]. When running in great pressure, certain workloads will keep seeing premature OOM with MGLRU, and never see any OOM with classical LRU. This might get worse if we implement async aging, or avoid hotness inversion in aging, as they will slow down the aging process even more. To fix this, let's first drop the get_nr_gens() == MIN_NR_GENS early return and let the raised-priority scan bound cover max_seq itself. Mapped folios will still survive as the rmap PTE check will keep them. Unmapped cache folios may thrash more under heavy memory pressure. This should instead be addressed through refault-distance and frequency-aware promotion [3]. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20261114200803.23129-5-baohua@kernel.org Link: https://github.com/ryncsn/emm-test-project/tree/master/file-anon-mix-pressure [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260428-mglru-reclaim-v7-0-02fabb92dc43@tencent.com/ [2] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20260502-mglru-fg-v1-0-913619b014d9@tencent.com/ [3] Signed-off-by: Kairui Song Signed-off-by: Barry Song (Xiaomi) Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Reviewed-by: Kunwu Chan Cc: Axel Rasmussen Cc: Baolin Wang Cc: Baoquan He Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Cc: Liam R. Howlett Cc: wang lian Cc: Cc: Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Qi Zheng Cc: Ridong Chen Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Kairui Song Cc: Shakeel Butt Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: wangzicheng Cc: Wei Xu Cc: Yuanchu Xie Cc: Bo Zhang Cc: Hui Zhu Cc: Siddharth Chintamaneni Cc: Kunwu Chan Cc: Bo Zhang mm/vmscan.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) --- a/mm/vmscan.c~mm-mglru-lift-the-forced-protection-of-reclaimer +++ a/mm/vmscan.c @@ -4677,7 +4677,7 @@ void lru_gen_reparent_memcg(struct mem_c ******************************************************************************/ static bool sort_folio(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct folio *folio, struct scan_control *sc, - int min_gen, int tier_idx) + int min_gen, int max_gen, int tier_idx) { int gen = folio_lru_gen(folio); int type = folio_is_file_lru(folio); @@ -4694,12 +4694,22 @@ static bool sort_folio(struct lruvec *lr if (!folio_evictable(folio)) return false; - /* promoted */ + /* promoted, or moved due to reparenting. */ if (gen != min_gen) { list_move(&folio->lru, &lrugen->folios[gen][type][zone]); return true; } + /* + * We are reclaiming the last gen left. Folios in this gen can no + * longer be promoted or protected, so just isolate them. The one + * exception is lru_gen_reparent_memcg(), which is handled above. + */ + if (min_gen == max_gen) { + VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(zone > sc->reclaim_idx); + return false; + } + /* protected */ if (tier > tier_idx || refs + workingset == BIT(LRU_REFS_WIDTH) + 1) { gen = folio_inc_gen(lruvec, folio, min_gen); @@ -4754,15 +4764,16 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_ struct list_head *list, int *isolatedp) { int i; - int gen; enum node_stat_item item; int sorted = 0; int scanned = 0; int isolated = 0; int skipped = 0; + int gen, max_gen; unsigned long min_seq; unsigned long remaining = nr_to_scan; struct lru_gen_folio *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen; + DEFINE_MAX_SEQ(lruvec); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(nr_to_scan > MAX_LRU_BATCH); VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(list)); @@ -4775,18 +4786,24 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_ if (sc->priority == DEF_PRIORITY) min_seq = lrugen->min_seq[type]; else - min_seq = lruvec_populated_min_seq(lruvec, type, lrugen->max_seq - MIN_NR_GENS + 1); - - if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, type) == MIN_NR_GENS) - return 0; + min_seq = lruvec_populated_min_seq(lruvec, type, lrugen->max_seq); gen = lru_gen_from_seq(min_seq); + max_gen = lru_gen_from_seq(max_seq); + for (i = MAX_NR_ZONES; i > 0; i--) { LIST_HEAD(moved); int skipped_zone = 0; int zone = (sc->reclaim_idx + i) % MAX_NR_ZONES; struct list_head *head = &lrugen->folios[gen][type][zone]; + /* + * If there is only one gen left, rotating the unreclaimable + * zone become meaningless, just skip them. + */ + if (gen == max_gen && zone > sc->reclaim_idx) + continue; + while (!list_empty(head)) { struct folio *folio = lru_to_folio(head); int delta = folio_nr_pages(folio); @@ -4797,8 +4814,7 @@ static int scan_folios(unsigned long nr_ VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(folio_zonenum(folio) != zone, folio); scanned += delta; - - if (sort_folio(lruvec, folio, sc, gen, tier)) + if (sort_folio(lruvec, folio, sc, gen, max_gen, tier)) sorted += delta; else if (isolate_folio(lruvec, folio, sc)) { list_add(&folio->lru, list); _ Patches currently in -mm which might be from kasong@tencent.com are mm-mglru-report-evictable-sizes-per-type.patch mm-mglru-extract-lruvec_populated_min_seq-helper.patch mm-mglru-reclaim-from-the-oldest-populated-gen.patch mm-mglru-lift-the-forced-protection-of-reclaimer.patch mm-mglru-skip-zones-above-reclaim_idx-instead-of-rotating-them.patch mm-mglru-return-for-unavailable-anon-reclaim-earlier.patch mm-mglru-balance-anon-and-file-scan-budget-by-refault-rate.patch mm-mglru-lift-youngest-gen-protection-for-higher-priority.patch