From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>,
"Li, Xiaoyun" <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
"ophirmu@mellanox.com" <ophirmu@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 11:44:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2027509.fDzOy6Rher@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE0941513593EB@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
02/11/2017 11:22, Wang, Zhihong:
> > I don't know what is creating this drop exactly.
> > When doing different tests on different environments, we do not see this
> > drop.
> > If nobody else can see such issue, I guess we can ignore it.
>
> Hi Thomas, Xiaoyun,
>
> With this patch (commit 84cc318424d49372dd2a5fbf3cf84426bf95acce) I see
> more than 20% performance drop in vhost loopback test with testpmd
> macswap for 256 bytes packets, which means it impacts actual vSwitching
> performance.
>
> Suggest we fix it or revert it for this release.
I think we need more numbers to take a decision.
What is the benefit of this patch? In which use-cases?
What are the drawbacks? In which use-cases?
Please, it is a call to test performance with and without this patch
in more environments (CPU, packet size, applications).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-02 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-26 7:41 [PATCH v3 0/3] dynamic linking support Xiaoyun Li
2017-09-26 7:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-01 23:41 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-02 0:12 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-09-26 7:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] app/test: run-time dispatch over memcpy perf test Xiaoyun Li
2017-09-26 7:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] efd: run-time dispatch over x86 EFD functions Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-02 0:08 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-02 0:09 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-02 9:35 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-02 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] run-time Linking support Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-02 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-02 16:39 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-02 23:10 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-03 11:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-03 11:39 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-03 12:12 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-03 12:23 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-02 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] app/test: run-time dispatch over memcpy perf test Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-02 16:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] efd: run-time dispatch over x86 EFD functions Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-02 16:52 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-03 8:15 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-03 11:23 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-03 11:27 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] run-time Linking support Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] app/test: run-time dispatch over memcpy perf test Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-03 14:59 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] efd: run-time dispatch over x86 EFD functions Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-04 17:56 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] run-time Linking support Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-04 22:33 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-04 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 " Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-04 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-05 9:37 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-05 9:38 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-05 11:19 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-05 11:26 ` Richardson, Bruce
2017-10-05 11:26 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-05 12:12 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-04 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] app/test: run-time dispatch over memcpy perf test Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-04 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] efd: run-time dispatch over x86 EFD functions Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-05 9:40 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-05 10:23 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-05 12:33 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] run-time Linking support Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-05 12:33 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-09 17:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-13 1:06 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-13 7:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-13 7:30 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-13 7:31 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-13 7:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-13 7:41 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-05 12:33 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] app/test: run-time dispatch over memcpy perf test Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-05 12:33 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] efd: run-time dispatch over x86 EFD functions Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-05 13:24 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] run-time Linking support Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-09 17:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-13 0:58 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-13 9:01 ` [PATCH v8 " Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-13 9:01 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-13 9:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-13 10:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-17 21:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-18 2:21 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-18 6:22 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-19 2:45 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-19 6:58 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-19 7:51 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-19 8:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-19 8:50 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-19 8:59 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-19 9:00 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-19 9:29 ` Bruce Richardson
2017-10-20 1:02 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-25 6:55 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-25 7:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-29 8:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-11-02 10:22 ` Wang, Zhihong
2017-11-02 10:44 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-11-02 10:58 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-11-02 12:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-11-03 7:47 ` Yao, Lei A
2017-10-25 8:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-25 8:54 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-25 9:00 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-25 10:32 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-25 9:14 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-13 9:01 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] app/test: run-time dispatch over memcpy perf test Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-13 9:01 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] efd: run-time dispatch over x86 EFD functions Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-13 13:13 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] run-time Linking support Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2027509.fDzOy6Rher@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=ophirmu@mellanox.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.