From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@ix.netcom.com>
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: bbappend on top of bbappend
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:28:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2042870.WHnUqHPfUc@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <587F23315DEC485E8C9E59B4F24916CC@PAULD>
Hi Paul,
On Friday 16 August 2013 16:22:00 Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
> In meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xinput-calibrator (Danny branch, currently
> used by Gumstix), there's a recipe called xinput-calibrator-git.bb, which
> installs a script for running a touchscreen calibration app if not already
> calibrated.
>
> In
> meta-openembedded/meta-systemd/meta-oe/recipes-graphics/xinput-calibrator,
> there's a bbappend for this recipe, which declares a local file called
> xinput-calibrator.service, which is supposed to run the above script on
> startup. It inherits the systemd bbclass, which I assume knows how to
> install this service file automagically, since there's no explicit
> do_install copying the file anywhere.
The systemd.bbclass we now have in OE-Core (as of dylan) does not handle this
automatically. The old one in meta-systemd does appear to though.
> The trouble is, on my Gumstix, the service fails because it needs a
> DISPLAY environment variable to tell it what display to calibrate. I
> figured the simplest thing to do would be to add an Environment=DISPLAY=:0
> line to the service unit file.
FWIW, when xinput-calibrator was moved over to OE-Core it was determined that
this shouldn't even be started as a service by systemd, but instead launched
using Xsession.d. You may have better results if you bring in the recipe from
OE-Core master and use that instead.
> My shameless hack was to add a ROOTFS_POSTPROCESS_COMMAND that runs sed on
> the final copy of this service file in the rootfs, to insert the
> Environment= line, and that works. But I'd rather just provide my own
> version of the file, and use another .bbappend to prepend its file
> location to FILESEXTRAPATHS, overriding the one in the systemd .bbappend
> file.
>
> So I tried that, just putting the following two lines into my own
> .bbappend:
>
> FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:"
> PRINC := "${@int(PRINC) + 1}"
>
> and of course putting the tweaked service file into my files subdirectory.
> On starting the build, it almost immediately spat this out:
>
> NOTE:
> ['/home/pauld/yocto/meta-foo/recipes/xinput-calibrator_git.bbappend',
> '/home/pauld/yocto/poky/meta-openembedded/meta-systemd/meta-oe/recipes-gra
> phics/xinput-calibrator/xinput-calibrator_git.bbappend'] to
> ['/home/pauld/yocto/poky/meta-openembedded/meta-systemd/meta-oe/recipes-gr
> aphics/xinput-calibrator/xinput-calibrator_git.bbappend']
>
> (That was all on one line, of course.)
BitBake will report new appends this way so this is expected. It is ugly
though.
> The do_rootfs failed, and its log says that xinput-calibrator is an
> unknown package, and that it can't satisfy the dependency from
> packagegroup-core-x11-base.
I don't know why this would happen. It's unlikely to be related to changes
you've made that are discussed here. Does the package appear under
tmp/deploy/(ipk|rpm|deb)/ ?
> I read somewhere that stacked bbappends are handled in the order of layer
> priority. Mine is 5, the meta-systemd layer is 7. I don't know which is
> "higher", or if one wants a higher or lower priority in order to be the
> last one to prepend to the path.
They will be applied in ascending order, so anything in the bbappend from a
layer with a higher layer priority number takes precedence. FYI you can see
the appends in effect in your configuration using:
bitbake-layers show-appends
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-22 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-16 23:22 bbappend on top of bbappend Paul D. DeRocco
2013-08-22 10:28 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2013-08-22 17:58 ` Paul D. DeRocco
2013-09-04 11:15 ` Paul Eggleton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2042870.WHnUqHPfUc@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pderocco@ix.netcom.com \
--cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.