From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Jackson Subject: Re: [PATCH] xl: improve the comments for sedf parameters checking Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 11:36:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20465.31173.337759.159759@mariner.uk.xensource.com> References: <20461.55260.431307.425828@mariner.uk.xensource.com> <1340995324.5953.13.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1340995324.5953.13.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Dario Faggioli , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xl: improve the comments for sedf parameters checking"): > On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 17:29 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Dario Faggioli writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xl: improve the comments for sedf parameters checking"): > > > As agreed during review of what has become 513d5e196e23. > > > > Thanks. I'm afraid it doesn't apply to tip though. > > This code got moved to libxl while we were trying to fixup this stuff > and the equivalent to this patch was applied to libxl as part of > 25494:836db8c4b9f9 "libxl: fix validation of scheduling parameters for > sedf". Oh good. Ian.