From: "Jérémie Galarneau via lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
To: Subrata Paul <subrata.turs@gmail.com>
Cc: lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
Subject: Re: [lttng-dev] Running trace-rotate and session-rotate together
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 12:05:52 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2050940547.2707.1641402352283.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABAcCUNcS1yaP7-mLijXmecOczr9vQkOukhW4Q-YgKc6Vz-bZw@mail.gmail.com>
----- Message original -----
> De: "lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
> À: "lttng-dev" <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>
> Envoyé: Mardi 21 Décembre 2021 01:47:12
> Objet: [lttng-dev] Running trace-rotate and session-rotate together
> Hi,
> 1. In the lttng-enable-rotation manpage it is mentioned that we should not use
> trace rotate when automatic session rotate is enabled. Can you please tell me
> why?
> ```
> Important
> You may only use the enable-rotation command when:
> * The selected recording session was created in normal mode or in network
> streaming mode
> (see lttng-create(1)).
> * No channel was created with a configured trace file count or size limit (see
> the
> --tracefile-size and --tracefile-count options of the lttng-enable-channel(1)
> command).
> ```
Hi,
The reason mostly boils down to the fact that we didn't see a use case for this. Hence, it's not implemented nor tested.
Let me know if you have a use case for combining both features, though.
> 2. When automatic session rotate is running, is there any race condition in
> writing the current ring buffers and archiving the current trace chunk?
I am not sure I understand your question, but I think you're asking if session rotations are "atomic" with respect to the switchover of all per-CPU streams from one trace archive to the next?
The switchover is not instantaneous. The file output of each per-CPU stream is switched to the new trace archive sequentially. That leaves you with a window of time during which information, for a given stream, may be found in either the old trace archive or the new one. To be clear, no information is ever duplicated or lost during this operation.
I briefly touched on this topic in a presentation at the Open Source Summit 2018, see slide 32+[1]
The various colours represent successive trace archives produced by session rotations.
This transition window makes writing analyses a bit harder since the beginning and end of trace archives may not have all of the information for all per-CPU streams during a short window of time. That window is contained between issuing the rotation and receiving a confirmation that it has been completed (using the CLI or the liblttng-ctl API).
You can see that in that context, I chose to process trace archives in pairs to constitute an "effective trace archive" (slide 34) during which I can be sure I always have access to all events from all per-CPU streams.
Thanks,
Jérémie
[1] https://events19.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Fine-grained-Distributed-Application-Monitoring-Using-LTTng-J%C3%A9r%C3%A9mie-Galarneau-EfficiOS.pdf
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Regards,
> Subrata Paul
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
> https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
_______________________________________________
lttng-dev mailing list
lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org
https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-05 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-21 6:47 [lttng-dev] Running trace-rotate and session-rotate together Subrata Paul via lttng-dev
2022-01-05 17:05 ` Jérémie Galarneau via lttng-dev [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2050940547.2707.1641402352283.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
--cc=jeremie.galarneau@efficios.com \
--cc=subrata.turs@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.