From: devzero@web.de
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: stale nfs file handle with exported loopback mounts
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:05:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2056330190@web.de> (raw)
> I recommend replacing subtree_check with no_subtree_check, but it
> shouldn't make an important difference in this case.
ok, i leave it as is.
> This should work with nfs-utils 1.1.0 or later. With earlier releases
> you need to explicitly export the subordinate filesystems too.
>
mhh - opensuse doesn`t have nfs-utils package, but it has nfs-client-1.1.0-8 which looks like they repackaged nfs-utils 1.1.0
> It is a little odd that the errors are inconsistent.
ok, but only a minor issue, if an issue at all, isn`t it ?
> Can you find any log messages from mountd in syslog? What do they
> say?
yes, on the client i`m getting :
Jun 3 21:36:01 linux kernel: nfs_update_inode: inode number mismatch
Jun 3 21:36:01 linux kernel: expected (0:11/0x2), got (0:11/0x13881)
Jun 3 21:36:01 linux kernel: nfs_update_inode: inode number mismatch
Jun 3 21:36:01 linux kernel: expected (0:11/0x2), got (0:11/0x13881)
Jun 3 21:36:17 linux kernel: nfs_update_inode: inode number mismatch
Jun 3 21:36:17 linux kernel: expected (0:11/0x2), got (0:11/0x13881)
Jun 3 21:36:17 linux kernel: nfs_update_inode: inode number mismatch
Jun 3 21:36:17 linux kernel: expected (0:11/0x2), got (0:11/0x13881)
Jun 3 21:36:20 linux kernel: nfs_update_inode: inode number mismatch
Jun 3 21:36:20 linux kernel: expected (0:11/0x2), got (0:11/0x13881)
Jun 3 21:36:20 linux kernel: nfs_update_inode: inode number mismatch
no error message on the server:
Oct 26 10:09:31 opensuse103 mountd[4293]: authenticated unmount request from 10.0.0.40:1014 for /mnt (/mnt)
Oct 26 10:10:07 opensuse103 mountd[4293]: authenticated mount request from 10.0.0.40:612 for /mnt (/mnt)
Oct 26 10:10:43 opensuse103 mountd[4293]: authenticated unmount request from 10.0.0.40:623 for /mnt (/mnt)
Oct 26 10:10:52 opensuse103 mountd[4293]: authenticated mount request from 10.0.0.40:624 for /mnt (/mnt)
> Also what does
> cat /proc/fs/nfsd/exports
>
> on the server show.
opensuse103:~ # cat /proc/fs/nfsd/exports
# Version 1.1
# Path Client(Flags) # IPs
/mnt/iso1 *(ro,no_root_squash,sync,wdelay,crossmnt,uuid=2c49fef2:ba464293:9b2bf2b8:322ccbcb)
/mnt/iso3 *(ro,no_root_squash,sync,wdelay,crossmnt,uuid=27ae9c67:0b794b36:8b5e9e17:37b569eb)
/mnt *(ro,no_root_squash,sync,wdelay,crossmnt,uuid=08164ee4:2db141eb:ac961701:49c74396)
/mnt/iso2 *(ro,no_root_squash,sync,wdelay,crossmnt,uuid=2aad6ea5:a05d4441:b94c48e6:e5d9981e)
> Finally, a tcpdump:
>
> tcpdump -s 0 -w /tmp/tcpdump port 2049
>
> while you run the experiment might help.
ah - this seems to give a hint, but i don`t have a clue why the server (10.0.0.30) is telling the client (10.0.0.40) a "RPC Version mismatch".
I also tried --no-nfs-version 4 for rpc.mountd (setting in /etc/sysconfig/nfs), but this didn`t make a difference.
here is the tcpdump output - i did
- mount
- ls / ls -la / cd to subdirs
10:15:06.480542 IP 10.0.0.40.0 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 0 null
10:15:06.480572 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.0: reply ERR 0: RPC Version mismatch (167772160-0)
10:15:06.480765 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 2031114913 win 1460 <nop,nop,timestamp 686128 737918>
10:15:06.480821 IP 10.0.0.40.2079804678 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 108 fsinfo fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C743963CD81908
10:15:06.480833 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.1022: . ack 108 win 181 <nop,nop,timestamp 737918 686128>
10:15:06.513365 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2079804678: reply ok 84 fsinfo rtmax 65536 rtpref 65536 wtmax 65536 wtpref 65536 dtpref 4096
10:15:06.514408 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 85 win 1460 <nop,nop,timestamp 686160 737926>
10:15:06.514902 IP 10.0.0.40.2096581894 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 108 getattr fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C743963CD81908
10:15:06.515256 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2096581894: reply ok 116 getattr DIR 40755 ids 0/0 sz 4096
10:15:06.553865 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 201 win 1460 <nop,nop,timestamp 686201 737926>
10:16:03.091784 IP 10.0.0.40.2113359110 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 108 getattr fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C7439647219C8C
10:16:03.093366 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2113359110: reply ok 116 getattr DIR 40755 ids 0/0 sz 4096
10:16:03.096046 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 317 win 1460 <nop,nop,timestamp 743610 752071>
10:16:03.097370 IP 10.0.0.40.2130136326 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 112 access fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C743960000001F 001f
10:16:03.098156 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2130136326: reply ok 124 access c 0003
10:16:03.156812 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 441 win 1460 <nop,nop,timestamp 743651 752072>
10:16:08.967804 IP 10.0.0.40.2146913542 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 108 getattr fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C7439600000000
10:16:08.968305 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2146913542: reply ok 116 getattr DIR 40755 ids 0/0 sz 4096
10:16:08.974285 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 557 win 1460 <nop,nop,timestamp 749477 753540>
10:16:08.975739 IP 10.0.0.40.2163690758 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 132 readdirplus fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C7439600000000 512 bytes @ 0
10:16:08.975985 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2163690758: reply ok 1448 readdirplus
10:16:08.976510 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.1684108288: reply Unknown rpc response code=2021855861 340
10:16:08.982238 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 2345 win 2184 <nop,nop,timestamp 749479 753541>
10:16:08.984415 IP 10.0.0.40.2180467974 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 116 lookup fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C7439600000004 "iso3"
10:16:08.984931 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2180467974: reply ok 232 lookup fh Unknown/0100060027AE9C670B794B368B5E9E1737B569EB0000000100000002000041ED
10:16:09.008819 IP 10.0.0.40.2197245190 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 104 getattr fh Unknown/0100060027AE9C670B794B368B5E9E1737B569EB0000000FDD22CC3C7002F0AC
10:16:09.010946 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2197245190: reply ok 188 getattr REG 2 ids 5/0 sz 0
10:16:09.032541 IP 10.0.0.40.2214022406 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 128 getattr fh Unknown/01000702813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C74396E66D0700
10:16:09.033405 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2214022406: reply ok 188 getattr REG 1 ids 1/0 sz 0
10:16:09.033490 IP 10.0.0.40.2230799622 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 128 getattr fh Unknown/01000702813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C74396E56D0700
10:16:09.036811 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2230799622: reply ok 188 getattr REG 1 ids 1/0 sz 0
10:16:09.037823 IP 10.0.0.40.2247576838 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 108 getattr fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C7439600000000
10:16:09.039817 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2247576838: reply ok 116 getattr DIR 40755 ids 0/0 sz 4096
10:16:09.040423 IP 10.0.0.40.2264354054 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 112 getattr fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C743960000000F
10:16:09.040856 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2264354054: reply ok 188 getattr REG 2 ids 5/0 sz 0
10:16:09.041590 IP 10.0.0.40.2281131270 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 116 lookup fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C7439600000004 "iso2"
10:16:09.041920 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2281131270: reply ok 232 lookup fh Unknown/010006002AAD6EA5A05D4441B94C48E6E5D9981E0000000100000002000041ED
10:16:09.049633 IP 10.0.0.40.2297908486 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 104 getattr fh Unknown/010006002AAD6EA5A05D4441B94C48E6E5D9981E0000000F5FDC84454326E193
10:16:09.049781 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2297908486: reply ok 188 getattr REG 2 ids 5/0 sz 0
10:16:09.063218 IP 10.0.0.40.2314685702 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 128 getattr fh Unknown/01000702813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C74396E46D0700
10:16:09.072505 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2314685702: reply ok 188 getattr REG 1 ids 1/0 sz 0
10:16:09.091698 IP 10.0.0.40.2331462918 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 124 getattr fh Unknown/01000702813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C74396E46D0700
10:16:09.092022 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2331462918: reply ok 116 getattr REG 100644 ids 0/0 sz 1048576
10:16:09.128971 IP 10.0.0.40.2348240134 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 128 getattr fh Unknown/01000702813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C74396E36D0700
10:16:09.129304 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2348240134: reply ok 188 getattr REG 1 ids 1/0 sz 0
10:16:09.184155 IP 10.0.0.40.2365017350 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 124 getattr fh Unknown/01000702813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C74396E36D0700
10:16:09.184582 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2365017350: reply ok 116 getattr REG 100644 ids 0/0 sz 1048576
10:16:09.189234 IP 10.0.0.40.2381794566 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 116 lookup fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C7439600000004 "iso1"
10:16:09.189435 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2381794566: reply ok 232 lookup fh Unknown/010006002C49FEF2BA4642939B2BF2B8322CCBCB0000000100000002000041ED
10:16:09.193476 IP 10.0.0.40.2398571782 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 104 getattr fh Unknown/010006002C49FEF2BA4642939B2BF2B8322CCBCB0000000F58896A884A0C62B7
10:16:09.193652 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2398571782: reply ok 188 getattr REG 2 ids 5/0 sz 0
10:16:09.194937 IP 10.0.0.40.2415348998 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 128 getattr fh Unknown/01000702813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C74396E76D0700
10:16:09.195033 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2415348998: reply ok 188 getattr REG 1 ids 1/0 sz 0
10:16:09.195230 IP 10.0.0.40.2432126214 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 128 getattr fh Unknown/01000702813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C74396E86D0700
10:16:09.323635 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.1022: . ack 2572 win 416 <nop,nop,timestamp 753629 749566>
10:16:09.324345 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2432126214: reply ok 188 getattr REG 1 ids 1/0 sz 0
10:16:09.341475 IP 10.0.0.40.2448903430 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 128 getattr fh Unknown/01000702813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C74396E26D0700
10:16:09.341524 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.1022: . ack 2700 win 449 <nop,nop,timestamp 753632 749707>
10:16:09.341928 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2448903430: reply ok 188 getattr REG 1 ids 1/0 sz 0
10:16:09.342117 IP 10.0.0.40.2465680646 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 124 getattr fh Unknown/01000702813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C74396E26D0700
10:16:09.343404 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2465680646: reply ok 116 getattr REG 100644 ids 0/0 sz 1048576
10:16:09.389316 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 5573 win 2184 <nop,nop,timestamp 749751 753633>
10:16:13.449513 IP 10.0.0.40.2482457862 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 108 getattr fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C7439647219CB5
10:16:13.449815 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2482457862: reply ok 116 getattr DIR 40755 ids 0/0 sz 4096
10:16:13.452344 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 5689 win 2184 <nop,nop,timestamp 753943 754660>
10:16:13.453973 IP 10.0.0.40.2499235078 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 100 getattr fh Unknown/010006002C49FEF2BA4642939B2BF2B8322CCBCB47219C8C0000000047219C8C
10:16:13.454154 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2499235078: reply ok 116 getattr DIR 40755 ids 0/0 sz 4096
10:16:13.456194 IP 10.0.0.40.2516012294 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 108 getattr fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C7439647219C8C
10:16:13.456361 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2516012294: reply ok 116 getattr DIR 40755 ids 0/0 sz 4096
10:16:13.458282 IP 10.0.0.40.2532789510 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 116 lookup fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C7439600000004 "iso1"
10:16:13.458461 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2532789510: reply ok 232 lookup fh Unknown/010006002C49FEF2BA4642939B2BF2B8322CCBCB0000000100000002000041ED
10:16:13.510637 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 6153 win 2184 <nop,nop,timestamp 753985 754662>
10:16:14.030110 IP 10.0.0.40.2549566726 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 112 access fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C743960000001F 001f
10:16:14.030927 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2549566726: reply ok 124 access c 0003
10:16:14.033436 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 6277 win 2184 <nop,nop,timestamp 754548 754805>
10:16:14.034732 IP 10.0.0.40.2566343942 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 108 getattr fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C7439600000000
10:16:14.034980 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2566343942: reply ok 116 getattr DIR 40755 ids 0/0 sz 4096
10:16:14.037319 IP 10.0.0.40.2583121158 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 112 access fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C743960000001F 001f
10:16:14.037486 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2583121158: reply ok 124 access c 0003
10:16:14.040323 IP 10.0.0.40.2599898374 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 132 readdirplus fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C7439600000000 512 bytes @ 0
10:16:14.040554 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2599898374: reply ok 1448 readdirplus
10:16:14.041020 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.1684108288: reply Unknown rpc response code=2021855861 340
10:16:14.043583 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 8305 win 2908 <nop,nop,timestamp 754550 754808>
10:16:14.045104 IP 10.0.0.40.2616675590 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 112 access fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C743960000001F 001f
10:16:14.045402 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2616675590: reply ok 124 access c 0003
10:16:14.047830 IP 10.0.0.40.2633452806 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 112 access fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C743960000001F 001f
10:16:14.048039 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2633452806: reply ok 124 access c 0003
10:16:14.099385 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 8553 win 2908 <nop,nop,timestamp 754592 754810>
10:16:14.293714 IP 10.0.0.40.2650230022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 108 getattr fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C7439600000000
10:16:14.294019 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2650230022: reply ok 116 getattr DIR 40755 ids 0/0 sz 4096
10:16:14.297263 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 8669 win 2908 <nop,nop,timestamp 754763 754871>
10:16:14.297272 IP 10.0.0.40.2667007238 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 112 access fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C743960000001F 001f
10:16:14.297466 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2667007238: reply ok 124 access c 0003
10:16:14.297586 IP 10.0.0.40.2683784454 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 112 access fh Unknown/01000700813801000000000008164EE42DB141EBAC96170149C743960000001F 001f
10:16:14.297987 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2683784454: reply ok 124 access c 0003
10:16:14.301165 IP 10.0.0.40.2700561670 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 104 access fh Unknown/010006002C49FEF2BA4642939B2BF2B8322CCBCB0000001F47219C8C00000000 001f
10:16:14.301405 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2700561670: reply ok 124 access c 0003
10:16:14.351229 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 9041 win 2908 <nop,nop,timestamp 754810 754873>
10:16:14.842633 IP 10.0.0.40.2717338886 > 10.0.0.30.2049: 100 getattr fh Unknown/010006002C49FEF2BA4642939B2BF2B8322CCBCB0000000047219C8C00000000
10:16:14.851711 IP 10.0.0.30.2049 > 10.0.0.40.2717338886: reply ok 116 getattr DIR 40755 ids 0/0 sz 4096
10:16:14.856846 IP 10.0.0.40.1022 > 10.0.0.30.2049: . ack 9157 win 2908 <nop,nop,timestamp 755272 755008>
> > does somebody have such setup up and running and can tell his distro / kernel and nfs-utils version ?
> > maybe i change distro then.
>
> I doubt that it is a distro-specific thing. As long as you have
> nfs-utils-1.1.0 it should work. I don't have a 10.3 box
> set up yet, but it works fine on Debian/unstable for me.
ok, will try this on debian.
> Maybe try adding the "no_root_squash" export option.
no difference
> What does "ls -l /export" on the server show?
nothing unusual. no errors, just the dirs/mountpoints
Thanks for your help!
regards
roland
>
> On Saturday October 27, devzero@web.de wrote:
> > Hello !
> >
> > with 2.6.22 i`m trying to export loopback mounted iso-images.
> >
> > this is /etc/exports:
> >
> > /export *(ro,crossmnt,subtree_check)
>
> I recommend replacing subtree_check with no_subtree_check, but it
> shouldn't make an important difference in this case.
>
>
> This should work with nfs-utils 1.1.0 or later. With earlier releases
> you need to explicitly export the subordinate filesystems too.
>
> >
> > in /export, i have loopback mounted iso-images
> >
> > after mounting on the client side under /mnt (tried one older and one recent system) , i`m getting:
> >
> > vmhost:/mnt # ls -la
> > /bin/ls: iso1: Input/output error
> > /bin/ls: iso2 Input/output error
> > /bin/ls: iso3: Input/output error
> > total 10128
> > drwxrwxrwt 18 root root 270336 Oct 26 08:45 .
> > drwxrwxrwt 186 root root 20760 Oct 27 17:45 ..
> > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 16384 Jan 1 1970 iso1
> > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 16384 Jan 1 1970 iso2
> > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 16384 Jan 1 1970 iso3
> >
> > vmhost:/mnt/iso1 # ls
> > /bin/ls: .: Stale NFS file handle
> > vmhost:/mnt/iso1 # ls -la
> > /bin/ls: .: Input/output error
>
> It is a little odd that the errors are inconsistent.
>
> Can you find any log messages from mountd in syslog? What do they
> say?
> Also what does
> cat /proc/fs/nfsd/exports
>
> on the server show.
>
> Finally, a tcpdump:
>
> tcpdump -s 0 -w /tmp/tcpdump port 2049
>
> while you run the experiment might help.
>
> >
> > i`m unsure if i should blame suse here (it`s an opensuse 10.3 box which seems to have nfs-utils 1.1.0)
> >
> > does somebody have such setup up and running and can tell his distro / kernel and nfs-utils version ?
> > maybe i change distro then.
>
> I doubt that it is a distro-specific thing. As long as you have
> nfs-utils-1.1.0 it should work. I don't have a 10.3 box
> set up yet, but it works fine on Debian/unstable for me.
>
> Maybe try adding the "no_root_squash" export option.
> What does "ls -l /export" on the server show?
>
> NeilBrown
>
_________________________________________________________________________
In 5 Schritten zur eigenen Homepage. Jetzt Domain sichern und gestalten!
Nur 3,99 EUR/Monat! http://www.maildomain.web.de/?mc=021114
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next reply other threads:[~2007-10-30 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-30 20:05 devzero [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-10 15:14 stale nfs file handle with exported loopback mounts devzero
2007-11-02 19:37 devzero
2007-11-02 19:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-11-04 20:30 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-11-05 9:59 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-11-02 19:06 devzero
2007-11-02 19:23 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-11-02 19:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-31 22:50 devzero
2007-11-01 4:26 ` Neil Brown
2007-10-31 22:19 devzero
2007-10-31 22:39 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-31 20:46 devzero
2007-10-31 20:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-10-27 16:13 devzero
2007-10-30 5:14 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2056330190@web.de \
--to=devzero@web.de \
--cc=NFS@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.