From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5F515789C for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 11:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="WFxZb0/7" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1701776917; x=1733312917; h=message-id:date:mime-version:cc:subject:to:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Tu9aT/t0BHn27WrDh0oV0hR16aqvtEcIOAzFAbAEk18=; b=WFxZb0/7j0ipKoqi71O51T+ND3wxxQy6fd6gVKbkwfQTzXJ1N/VKARpM 02eyF21XTxmleTypMBzDCZ7YIqK/nz9yzaGG6KUYUIgcG/0Z+62kTXOxW wOlt3ICqtmwPET8irRJ2/7Pe3f5K3wP37I3buLkXULnfildAgV/QAoNb+ TcJqAOe2wHHlwpG8nz8XOPFOzEti/FU/E8RBsrmO+JKQ7EqOmByllfMPw APdqjdJKIK3SOWoI84Yhy1MmpxGm9LfksHUriKul55xvwoTUx9P0Z4iOC ZQxWO+C8Bp1XegiJk9A9p55G+7Sc3tQVcjvzzpJSuiOuH2CgBtsTMngaX w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10914"; a="393616367" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,252,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="393616367" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Dec 2023 03:48:29 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10914"; a="944237154" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,252,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="944237154" Received: from blu2-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.255.31.68]) ([10.255.31.68]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Dec 2023 03:48:25 -0800 Message-ID: <20602544-5b69-48be-bfa2-d08a21803d84@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 19:48:23 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: iommu@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, Jacob Pan , Yan Zhao , iommu@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove unrecoverable faults reporting To: Yi Liu , Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Robin Murphy , Jason Gunthorpe , Kevin Tian , Jean-Philippe Brucker , Nicolin Chen References: <20231115030226.16700-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <20231115030226.16700-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> <4593a682-b33b-4284-b94c-7f7fd9351171@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Baolu Lu In-Reply-To: <4593a682-b33b-4284-b94c-7f7fd9351171@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2023/12/4 18:54, Yi Liu wrote: > On 2023/11/15 11:02, Lu Baolu wrote: >> No device driver registers fault handler to handle the reported >> unrecoveraable faults. Remove it to avoid dead code. > > I noticed only ARM code is removed. So intel iommu driver does not have > code that tries to report unrecoveraable faults? Yes. Best regards, baolu