All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Norman Diamond" <ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp>
To: "Andries Brouwer" <aebr@win.tue.nl>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Vojtech Pavlik" <vojtech@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [3]
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 20:21:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <206701c37ab2$6a8033e0$2dee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030914122034.C3371@pclin040.win.tue.nl

"Andries Brouwer" <aebr@win.tue.nl> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 12:51:32PM +0900, Norman Diamond wrote:
> > In thread "Re: Trying to run 2.6.0-test3", Alan Cox replied to me:
> >
> > > > What will it take this time?
> > >
> > > Posting the patch with any luck ?
> >
> > I knew that that would not be sufficient.
>
> Just repeat. Do not repeat the complaining because complaining
> with zero information content is just discarded.
> But if you repeat the patch, together with an explanation of why
> this is the correct patch, sooner or later somebody will look at it.

Due to the complexity of this answer, I am making three separate postings.

I make no assertion that the following is correct or is a patch, but think
that it deserves consideration.  I spend about one day each weekend testing
this kernel, have had patches ignored enough times, and seriously think of
rejoining the set of users who never have time to test.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Norman Diamond" <ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp>
To: "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>; "Linux Kernel Mailing List"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "Andries Brouwer" <aebr@win.tue.nl>;
"Vojtech Pavlik" <vojtech@suse.cz>
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: Trying to run 2.6.0-test3


> "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> replied to me.
>
> > > accept a USB keyboard but they refused.  The patch which I sent to Vojtech
> > > Pavlik was ignored and these two keys continued not to work (except on my
> > > machine).  Finally Mike Fabian accepted a gift of a USB keyboard and this
> > > defect in Linux got fixed.  But only for somewhere around the last half of
> > > the 2.4 releases, not for 2.6.
> > > What will it take this time?
> >
> > Posting the patch with any luck ?
>
> Hirofumi Ogawa posted a patch for the yen-sign pipe key on 2003.07.23 for
> test1 but his patch still didn't get into test3.  On a PS/2 keyboard that
> seems to be the only key with any problem.
>
> Yesterday when I finally tried a USB keyboard and found that the backslash
> underbar has the same problem, maybe I was the first person to even try a
> Japanese USB keyboard in 2.6, and maybe no one at all tried some number of
> 2.5 series kernels.  As mentioned, usually I can only spend one day a week
> testing 2.6.  I'll try to spend one day next weekend trying to figure out
> the new necessary patch.  If I succeed, but if it gets ignored again, I'll
> probably rejoin the set of users who never have time to test.
>
> I really do think that if Andries Brouwer or Vojtech Pavlik would accept a
> gift of a USB keyboard then this kind of bug would be avoided a lot earlier.
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-14 11:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-14  3:51 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 10:20 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-14 11:14   ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [1] Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 11:15   ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [2] Norman Diamond
2003-09-14 11:21   ` Norman Diamond [this message]
2003-09-16 13:43     ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards [3] Andries Brouwer
2003-09-17 12:35       ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2003-09-17 17:22         ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-18 16:15           ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2003-09-21 11:06       ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 12:39         ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 12:48           ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 14:49             ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 17:07               ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 17:42                 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-21 17:52                   ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-22 12:22                 ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-24 10:02               ` Pavel Machek
     [not found]     ` <fa.gddv2je.1jk671u@ifi.uio.no>
2003-09-16 18:11       ` Junio C Hamano
2003-09-21 11:01 ` 2.6.0-test5 vs. Japanese keyboards Vojtech Pavlik
2003-09-21 13:26   ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-21 15:16     ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-22 12:21       ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-22 20:14         ` Andries Brouwer
2003-09-23 11:44           ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-23 17:22             ` Andries Brouwer
2003-10-15 10:22               ` Norman Diamond
2003-09-21 16:00   ` Andries Brouwer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='206701c37ab2$6a8033e0$2dee4ca5@DIAMONDLX60' \
    --to=ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp \
    --cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.