Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mailbox: qcom: Add IPQ5210 APCS compatible

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 29/06/2026 09:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 10:10:46AM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>> Add the APCS mailbox compatible for the IPQ5210 SoC. It uses the IPQ6018
>> APCS mailbox compatible as a fallback, so document the valid compatible
>> string combination in the binding.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>> no cover letter contents, it is a single patch
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml
>> index 1b4ef0688ca7..39bc374300c3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/qcom,apcs-kpss-global.yaml
>> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ properties:
>>        - items:
>>            - enum:
>>                - qcom,ipq5018-apcs-apps-global
>> +              - qcom,ipq5210-apcs-apps-global
>>                - qcom,ipq5332-apcs-apps-global
>>                - qcom,ipq5424-apcs-apps-global
>>                - qcom,ipq8074-apcs-apps-global
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 533704f3c28c3f5f9e2542aa3a6a326c32e6f5c0
>> change-id: 20260625-mailbox-01f977bcceec
>> prerequisite-change-id: 20260625-apss-clk-ed39c40ed468:v1
>> prerequisite-patch-id: d9efdd8a09b028b1343243c5f0e78cf3e8b1e253
> 
> Same author, just squash them.
> 
> I already complained within Qualcomm about this more than once. On the
> mailing list, on the internal company-wide open-source channel and in
> person now when I was in Hyderabad.
> 
> Repeating the same is waste of my time, easier to have blanket NAK on
> your patches.
> 

Oh, wait, this is even messier - when I look for these in lore, it
directed me to that patch, which I took as some other work. That is my
mistake, but still problem remain:
1. Dependencies are not easy to find.
2. The clk change-id is found and I do not understand why you made it as
dependency.

You are not making it easier for the community to understand this.

Anyway, I drop from patchwork.

Best regards,
Krzysztof