From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Artur Paszkiewicz Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/41] scsi: isci: remote_node_context: mark expected switch fall-throughs Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 09:51:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20772ae1-e9fa-3373-45eb-656fcd664b72@intel.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , intel-linux-scu Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 11/28/18 5:30 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Notice that, in this particular case, a dash is added as a token in > order to separate the "Fall through" annotations from the rest of > the comment on the same line, which is what GCC is expecting to find. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Acked-by: Artur Paszkiewicz