From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B6BC71153 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 20:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com (lelv0142.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.249]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.43790.1694376681650260667 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 13:11:21 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=jCFWjYNS; spf=pass (domain: ti.com, ip: 198.47.23.249, mailfrom: rs@ti.com) Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 38AKBHgB126200; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 15:11:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1694376677; bh=oVrjMF2NP8ONp7rZ6VAyvd7qoqvsPwrKevCo2V5h3AM=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=jCFWjYNS7WPlGKaLpNvJ68z99ZP9LrNseN74dQMv+LWJu0xbljo+BfR+XGVFVOnE0 LuUfniemvVRdQhLbrTmWJn5gquKUpUc+89sm8tWuTgfPFdNYAHWurHHGWvpGQxupJ8 1ajKe711sAifenQ0VTH2zo7DkiG6Xq290/0mVqQ4= Received: from DFLE106.ent.ti.com (dfle106.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.27]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 38AKBH8U012954 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 10 Sep 2023 15:11:17 -0500 Received: from DFLE106.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.27) by DFLE106.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 15:11:17 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DFLE106.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 15:11:17 -0500 Received: from [128.247.81.144] (ileaxei01-snat2.itg.ti.com [10.180.69.6]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 38AKBHVD041030; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 15:11:17 -0500 Message-ID: <208a2844-9ee3-4e51-afb1-5de1255bfac4@ti.com> Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2023 15:11:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2] bitbake-worker: remove the network flag Content-Language: en-US, en-US-large To: Alexander Kanavin CC: , , , References: <20230910194648.942409-2-rs@ti.com> From: Randolph Sapp In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2023 20:11:22 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/bitbake-devel/message/15026 On 9/10/23 14:57, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Please stop sending the patch. You are just winding everyone up. If > you want to have a discussion, open a thread with the comment about > icecc and friends, and we'll take it from there, otherwise any further > submission from you will be treated with suspicion and mistrust, which > is not the outcome you want. > > Alex > [snip] Fair enough. It was my intent to actually submit a usable patch with this discussion but the first revision was a bit too hastily sent. Rest assured, this will be the last revision. I'm not here to push the matter. I just figured this was the next step if the network flag didn't behave the same for all users. Seems like people like the current behavior though. That's fine. I just think this should be documented somewhere if that's the case. I can submit a patch for that documentation update instead, if that's preferred.