diff for duplicates of <2097113.JiHb7Y1Uf1@ada> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 2fb0bae..24b2a99 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ Hei hei, -Am Donnerstag, 29. M?rz 2018, 10:01:26 CEST schrieb Alexander Dahl: +Am Donnerstag, 29. März 2018, 10:01:26 CEST schrieb Alexander Dahl: > This is the result: > > INT NAME RATE MAX -> 17 [vel timer at fffa] 1837 Ints/s (max: 1912) +> 17 [vel timer@fffa] 1837 Ints/s (max: 1912) > 26 [ vel eth0] 3 Ints/s (max: 11) Above was with v4.16-rc7+, and CONFIG_ATMEL_CLOCKSOURCE_TCB=y, @@ -24,13 +24,13 @@ old and new driver on the otherwise same kernel source. I just double checked it, and with the other clocksource on v4.16-rc7+ I get: INT NAME RATE MAX - 17 [vel timer at fffa] 1904 Ints/s (max: 1922) + 17 [vel timer@fffa] 1904 Ints/s (max: 1922) 26 [ vel eth0] 6 Ints/s (max: 7) The lower rates I reported yesterday were from older kernels v4.14.29-rt25 and v4.15.13, so there might be the question why v4.16-rc7+ has a much higher rate with tc_clkevt? But there's no real difference between tc_clkevt and -timer at fffa? when both measured with v4.16-rc7+ on this target. I know +timer@fffa… when both measured with v4.16-rc7+ on this target. I know Alexandre has lower rates though, may depend on other parameters. So for completeness, I just tested the clean v4.16-rc7 without this patch diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index ec18067..0f440c1 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -1,19 +1,24 @@ "ref\020180223171558.7037-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com\0" "ref\020180328155033.GH13942@piout.net\0" "ref\03478710.yJBBt3uoRT@ada\0" - "From\0ada@thorsis.com (Alexander Dahl)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v3 0/6] clocksource: rework Atmel TCB timer driver\0" + "From\0Alexander Dahl <ada@thorsis.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] clocksource: rework Atmel TCB timer driver\0" "Date\0Thu, 29 Mar 2018 17:11:08 +0200\0" "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "Cc\0Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>" + Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> + Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> + Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> + " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hei hei,\n" "\n" - "Am Donnerstag, 29. M?rz 2018, 10:01:26 CEST schrieb Alexander Dahl:\n" + "Am Donnerstag, 29. M\303\244rz 2018, 10:01:26 CEST schrieb Alexander Dahl:\n" "> This is the result:\n" "> \n" "> INT NAME RATE MAX\n" - "> 17 [vel timer at fffa] 1837 Ints/s (max: 1912)\n" + "> 17 [vel timer@fffa] 1837 Ints/s (max: 1912)\n" "> 26 [ vel eth0] 3 Ints/s (max: 11)\n" "\n" "Above was with v4.16-rc7+, and CONFIG_ATMEL_CLOCKSOURCE_TCB=y, \n" @@ -33,13 +38,13 @@ "I just double checked it, and with the other clocksource on v4.16-rc7+ I get:\n" "\n" "INT NAME RATE MAX\n" - " 17 [vel timer at fffa] 1904 Ints/s (max: 1922)\n" + " 17 [vel timer@fffa] 1904 Ints/s (max: 1922)\n" " 26 [ vel eth0] 6 Ints/s (max: 7)\n" "\n" "The lower rates I reported yesterday were from older kernels v4.14.29-rt25 and \n" "v4.15.13, so there might be the question why v4.16-rc7+ has a much higher rate \n" "with tc_clkevt? But there's no real difference between tc_clkevt and \n" - "timer at fffa? when both measured with v4.16-rc7+ on this target. I know \n" + "timer@fffa\342\200\246 when both measured with v4.16-rc7+ on this target. I know \n" "Alexandre has lower rates though, may depend on other parameters.\n" "\n" "So for completeness, I just tested the clean v4.16-rc7 without this patch \n" @@ -54,4 +59,4 @@ "HTH & Greets\n" Alex -0a08d7c1f8de541ab52efa8d097e4906ca5a705df6da49d3238a05e3404ebcda +779090e4aec3a7a31739f5f7571eb299e7438d24659b63f04d655a609a313e99
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.