All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@lycos.com>
To: rjw@sisk.pl
Cc: tino.keitel@tikei.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [REGRESSION] [Linux 3.2] top/htop and all other CPU usage metering applications has gone crackers
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 11:57:12 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2103936926.165868.1322395032341.JavaMail.mail@webmail17> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 201111271245.57772.rjw@sisk.pl

> On Nov 27, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: 
> 
> On Sunday, November 27, 2011, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 21:05:53 +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:30:15 +0000, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > I'd like to report a weird regression in Linux 3.2 (running rc3 now) - all CPU metering applications have gone terribly mad
> > > > under this kernel:
> > > 
> > > I get the same using top, htop and the gnome system monitor with kernel
> > > 3.2 on a Sandy Bridge quad core box, running Debian unstable.
> > 
> > I just tested 3.2-rc2, and see the same bug.
> 
> I'm seeing that too on one of my test boxes, but not all the time
> (i.e. there are periods in which the readings are correct).  The other boxes
> I've tested with 3.2-rc are fine in that respect.
> 
> Also, it seems that it shows 100%-(real load) when it is wrong.  So, it looks
> like there's an overflow somewhere in the CPU load measuring code, at least
> on some CPUs.
> 
> What's your CPU, BTW?

Intel Core i5 2500, i686

Best wishes,

Artem

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-27 11:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-24 10:30 [REGRESSION] [Linux 3.2] top/htop and all other CPU usage metering applications has gone crackers Artem S. Tashkinov
2011-11-24 20:05 ` Tino Keitel
2011-11-27 11:04   ` Tino Keitel
2011-11-27 11:45     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-27 11:45       ` Tino Keitel
2011-11-27 11:56         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-27 11:57       ` Artem S. Tashkinov [this message]
2011-11-28 19:55       ` Tino Keitel
2011-11-28 20:19         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-28 21:41           ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-28 21:43             ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-28 21:48             ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-29  8:14             ` Michal Hocko
2011-11-29 21:25         ` Tino Keitel
2011-11-29 21:16 ` Maciej Rutecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2103936926.165868.1322395032341.JavaMail.mail@webmail17 \
    --to=t.artem@lycos.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=tino.keitel@tikei.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.