From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] eal: fix libabi macro for device generalization patches Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:23:57 +0200 Message-ID: <2105472.0JeDs3sFAP@xps13> References: <1477485486-20433-1-git-send-email-shreyansh.jain@nxp.com> <8ed305c5-92aa-a169-533e-47057ea3e6fd@nxp.com> <275ffc52-acb0-c177-da32-fb8c3fee497a@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Ferruh Yigit , Shreyansh Jain Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F8ABB88 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:24:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 140so24014995wmv.0 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:24:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <275ffc52-acb0-c177-da32-fb8c3fee497a@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-10-26 15:25, Ferruh Yigit: > eal version seems already increased for this release, 2 => 3, in: > d7e61ad3ae36 ("log: remove deprecated history dump") Yes thanks. > So NO need to increase it again, sorry for late notice, I just > recognized it. > Only librte_ether and librte_cryptodev requires the increase. Please could you also explain in the commit message that: - EAL was already bumped - what is the breakage in ethdev - what is the breakage in cryptodev Thanks