Re: qt4e-demo-image with meta-fsl-arm: successful build?

[Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>]

On Monday 10 June 2013 08:43:38 Steve Sakoman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com> wrote:
> > Le Mon, 10 Jun 2013 05:58:42 -0700,
> > 
> > Steve Sakoman <sakoman@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >> I haven't begun debugging yet, but I had 2 initial thoughts as to why
> >> the X error message:
> >> 
> >> 1. The qtdemo init seems to be written to support both x and x-free
> >> setups, so perhaps the init is getting confused
> >> 2. I had built the x11-free version of qt prior to the qte version, so
> >> perhaps that causes the issue
> >> 
> >> I started a clean build just in case #2 is the cause.
> > 
> > OK #2 is clearly a situation I avoid here as this created me some
> > troubles in the past.
> 
> And it created issues for me too :-)
> 
> A clean build of qt4e-demo-image works.  A clean build of a similar
> image based on qt4-x11-free however is broken as described in my
> original post.
> 
> Clearly one must choose either qt4-x11-free or qt4e, having both in
> the same build setup is broken (perhaps by design)

I can say this is not by design. The two should be able to coexist (which is 
why the library names are different); if they currently cannot we need to figure 
out why that is and get it fixed.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre