From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: S3C244X/S3C64XX SoC camera host interface driver questions Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 23:23:25 +0100 Message-ID: <2110908.qaFg5OjAC4@flatron> References: <5096E8D7.4070304@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:57086 "EHLO mail-ee0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751769Ab2KDWX2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Nov 2012 17:23:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5096E8D7.4070304@gmail.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Sylwester Nawrocki Cc: Andrey Gusakov , In-Bae Jeong , Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= , LMML , linux-samsung-soc Hi Andrey, On Sunday 04 of November 2012 23:14:47 Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > >> Are you using this version of patches: > >> http://git.linuxtv.org/snawrocki/media.git/shortlog/refs/heads/s3c-cam > >> if ?> > > I'm using patches from > > https://github.com/snawrocki/linux/commits/s3c-camif-v3.5 wich was in > > your mail to samsung maillist. > > I suggest you to update to the s3c-camif branch as above, it includes > some bug fixes. Sorry, I don't have exact patch for your issue handy > right now. Yes, you should definitely try the branch pointed by Sylwester, because the one you originally tested does not contain my fixes for S3C6410. Best regards, Tomasz Figa