From: Keith Owens <kaos@sgi.com>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] reduce IPI noise due to /dev/cdrom open/close
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 15:32:19 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21169.1151991139@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "03 Jul 2006 11:33:54 -0400." <yq0mzbqhfdp.fsf@jaguar.mkp.net>
Jes Sorensen (on 03 Jul 2006 11:33:54 -0400) wrote:
>Anyway, this patch reduces the IPI noise by keeping a cpumask of CPUs
>which have items in the bh lru and only flushing on the relevant
>CPUs. On systems with larger CPU counts it's quite normal that only a
>few CPUs are actively doing block IO, so spewing IPIs everywhere to
>flush this is unnecessary.
>
>Index: linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c
>===================================================================
>--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/buffer.c
>+++ linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c
>@@ -1323,6 +1323,7 @@ struct bh_lru {
> };
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bh_lru, bh_lrus) = {{ NULL }};
>+static cpumask_t lru_in_use;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> #define bh_lru_lock() local_irq_disable()
>@@ -1352,9 +1353,14 @@ static void bh_lru_install(struct buffer
> lru = &__get_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
> if (lru->bhs[0] != bh) {
> struct buffer_head *bhs[BH_LRU_SIZE];
>- int in;
>- int out = 0;
>+ int in, out, cpu;
>
>+ cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
Why raw_smp_processor_id? That normally indicates code that wants a
lazy cpu number, but this code requires the exact cpu number, IMHO
using raw_smp_processor_id is confusing. smp_processor_id can safely
be used here, bh_lru_lock has disabled irq or preempt.
>+ /* Test first to avoid cache lines bouncing around */
>+ if (!cpu_isset(cpu, lru_in_use))
>+ cpu_set(cpu, lru_in_use);
>+
>+ out = 0;
> get_bh(bh);
> bhs[out++] = bh;
> for (in = 0; in < BH_LRU_SIZE; in++) {
>@@ -1500,19 +1506,28 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__bread);
> */
> static void invalidate_bh_lru(void *arg)
> {
>- struct bh_lru *b = &get_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
>+ struct bh_lru *b;
> int i;
>
>+ local_irq_disable();
>+ b = &get_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
> for (i = 0; i < BH_LRU_SIZE; i++) {
> brelse(b->bhs[i]);
> b->bhs[i] = NULL;
> }
> put_cpu_var(bh_lrus);
>+ local_irq_enable();
> }
>
> static void invalidate_bh_lrus(void)
> {
>- on_each_cpu(invalidate_bh_lru, NULL, 1, 1);
>+ /*
>+ * Need to hand down a copy of the mask or we wouldn't be run
>+ * anywhere due to the original mask being cleared
>+ */
>+ cpumask_t mask = lru_in_use;
>+ cpus_clear(lru_in_use);
>+ schedule_on_each_cpu_mask(invalidate_bh_lru, NULL, mask);
> }
Racy? Start with an empty lru_in_use.
Cpu A Cpu B
invalidate_bh_lrus()
mask = lru_in_use;
preempted
block I/O
bh_lru_install()
cpu_set(cpu, lru_in_use);
resume
cpus_clear(lru_in_use);
schedule_on_each_cpu_mask() - does not send IPI to cpu B
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-04 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-03 15:33 [patch] reduce IPI noise due to /dev/cdrom open/close Jes Sorensen
2006-07-03 15:37 ` Milton Miller
2006-07-04 7:47 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-04 7:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-04 8:12 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-04 8:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-04 8:33 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-04 13:02 ` Helge Hafting
2006-07-04 8:42 ` Milton Miller
2006-07-04 8:59 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-04 9:30 ` Milton Miller
2006-07-03 15:37 ` [PATCH] simplfy bh_lru_install Milton Miller
2006-07-03 15:37 ` Milton Miller
2006-07-04 5:32 ` Keith Owens [this message]
2006-07-04 6:41 ` [patch] reduce IPI noise due to /dev/cdrom open/close Andrew Morton
2006-07-04 7:51 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-04 9:13 ` Milton Miller
2006-07-04 17:33 ` Nick Piggin
2006-07-05 7:30 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-05 18:26 ` Nick Piggin
2006-07-05 0:10 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-07-04 7:49 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-07-04 8:04 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21169.1151991139@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=kaos@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.