From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:27:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2125012.dsI546JiDj@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190731153419.7b728744@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wednesday, July 31, 2019 7:34:19 AM CEST Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> --Sig_/RVaztRR.13XAL2aXFk8lo/g
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allnoconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/sched/core.o: in function `cpuidle_poll_time':
> core.c:(.text+0x230): multiple definition of `cpuidle_poll_time'; arch/x86/=
> kernel/process.o:process.c:(.text+0xc0): first defined here
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/sched/loadavg.o: in function `cpuidle_poll_time=
> ':
> loadavg.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `cpuidle_poll_time'; arch/x86=
> /kernel/process.o:process.c:(.text+0xc0): first defined here
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/sched/clock.o: in function `cpuidle_poll_time':
> clock.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `cpuidle_poll_time'; arch/x86/k=
> ernel/process.o:process.c:(.text+0xc0): first defined here
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/sched/cputime.o: in function `cpuidle_poll_time=
> ':
> cputime.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `cpuidle_poll_time'; arch/x86=
> /kernel/process.o:process.c:(.text+0xc0): first defined here
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/sched/idle.o: in function `cpuidle_poll_time':
> idle.c:(.text+0xd0): multiple definition of `cpuidle_poll_time'; arch/x86/k=
> ernel/process.o:process.c:(.text+0xc0): first defined here
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/sched/fair.o: in function `cpuidle_poll_time':
> fair.c:(.text+0xb20): multiple definition of `cpuidle_poll_time'; arch/x86/=
> kernel/process.o:process.c:(.text+0xc0): first defined here
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/sched/rt.o: in function `cpuidle_poll_time':
> rt.c:(.text+0x790): multiple definition of `cpuidle_poll_time'; arch/x86/ke=
> rnel/process.o:process.c:(.text+0xc0): first defined here
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/sched/deadline.o: in function `cpuidle_poll_tim=
> e':
> deadline.c:(.text+0xce0): multiple definition of `cpuidle_poll_time'; arch/=
> x86/kernel/process.o:process.c:(.text+0xc0): first defined here
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/sched/wait.o: in function `cpuidle_poll_time':
> wait.c:(.text+0x1d0): multiple definition of `cpuidle_poll_time'; arch/x86/=
> kernel/process.o:process.c:(.text+0xc0): first defined here
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/sched/wait_bit.o: in function `cpuidle_poll_tim=
> e':
> wait_bit.c:(.text+0x50): multiple definition of `cpuidle_poll_time'; arch/x=
> 86/kernel/process.o:process.c:(.text+0xc0): first defined here
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/sched/swait.o: in function `cpuidle_poll_time':
> swait.c:(.text+0x30): multiple definition of `cpuidle_poll_time'; arch/x86/=
> kernel/process.o:process.c:(.text+0xc0): first defined here
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/sched/completion.o: in function `cpuidle_poll_t=
> ime':
> completion.c:(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `cpuidle_poll_time'; arch/=
> x86/kernel/process.o:process.c:(.text+0xc0): first defined here
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 259231a04561 ("cpuidle: add poll_limit_ns to cpuidle_device structure")
>
> I have added the following patch for today:
>
I've applied this patch to my pm-cpuidle branch, thanks Stephen!
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 15:29:52 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle: header file stubs must be "static inline"
>
> An x86_64 allmodconfig build produces these errors:
>
> x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: kernel/sched/core.o: in function `cpuidle_poll_time':
> core.c:(.text+0x230): multiple definition of `cpuidle_poll_time'; arch/x86/=
> kernel/process.o:process.c:(.text+0xc0): first defined here
>
> (and more)
>
> Fixes: 259231a04561 ("cpuidle: add poll_limit_ns to cpuidle_device structur=
> e")
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
> include/linux/cpuidle.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuidle.h b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> index ba535a1a47d5..1a9f54eb3aa1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static inline int cpuidle_enter(struct cpuidle_driver *=
> drv,
> struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
> {return -ENODEV; }
> static inline void cpuidle_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index) =
> { }
> -extern u64 cpuidle_poll_time(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> +static inline u64 cpuidle_poll_time(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> {return 0; }
> static inline int cpuidle_register_driver(struct cpuidle_driver *drv)
> --=20
> 2.20.1
>
> --=20
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> --Sig_/RVaztRR.13XAL2aXFk8lo/g
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
> Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
>
>
> --Sig_/RVaztRR.13XAL2aXFk8lo/g--
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-31 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 133+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-31 5:34 linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-31 10:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-30 19:56 Mark Brown
2026-03-30 19:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-04-14 1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2025-04-14 15:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-12 12:58 Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-12 1:48 Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-12 13:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-02-08 3:42 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-24 0:51 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-24 15:56 ` Wysocki, Rafael J
2023-12-18 23:37 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-21 2:46 Stephen Rothwell
2023-07-14 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2023-07-14 18:19 ` Wysocki, Rafael J
2023-07-14 18:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-04-03 10:18 Stephen Rothwell
2023-04-03 1:25 Stephen Rothwell
2023-04-03 1:16 Stephen Rothwell
2023-04-03 1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-29 0:23 Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-29 13:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-04-28 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2022-04-28 3:07 ` Zhang Rui
2022-04-28 8:53 ` Zhang Rui
2022-04-28 8:56 ` Zhang Rui
2022-04-28 12:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-01-04 0:15 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-04 7:29 ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-01-04 8:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-04 14:43 ` Heiner Kallweit
2022-01-04 14:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-12-01 23:28 Stephen Rothwell
2021-12-02 10:04 ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-12-03 16:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-12-03 17:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-02-05 0:51 Stephen Rothwell
[not found] ` <CAHp75VfiyAtxg+wqZ30kSzCfFFsLndLjzrUc1njZG0x6vQeyBQ@mail.gmail.com>
2021-02-05 11:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-08 19:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-08 19:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-08 19:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-09 14:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-02-09 16:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-09 9:57 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-17 7:52 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-18 11:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-18 11:52 ` Colin Ian King
2020-03-18 12:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-19 5:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-19 9:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-15 0:02 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-15 9:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-04 9:41 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-04 9:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-07-04 10:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-01 3:37 Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-01 7:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-05-24 14:16 Mark Brown
2018-05-24 14:16 ` Mark Brown
2016-09-14 4:27 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-14 21:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-22 1:56 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-22 2:26 ` Steve Muckle
2016-07-22 12:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-22 12:16 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-07-11 1:46 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-11 4:48 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-07-11 5:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-11 12:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-02 2:12 Stephen Rothwell
2016-04-01 1:27 Stephen Rothwell
2016-04-01 20:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-12-09 1:54 Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-09 2:00 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-11-01 6:57 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-01 6:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-01 6:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-02 0:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-11-02 0:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-04-13 4:24 Stephen Rothwell
2015-04-13 12:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-04-15 2:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-09 2:26 Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-09 2:53 ` Jiang Liu
2015-02-09 3:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-09 5:36 ` Jiang Liu
2015-02-09 6:23 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-02-09 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-09 15:21 ` Jiang Liu
2015-02-09 15:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-02-09 3:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-02-09 3:53 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-08-11 1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-12 1:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-18 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-18 1:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-05 1:24 Stephen Rothwell
2013-07-05 1:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-03 23:58 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-04 11:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-30 8:48 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-30 12:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 0:03 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-14 12:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-14 13:22 ` Sedat Dilek
2013-01-14 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-28 4:02 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-28 9:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-11-26 6:09 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-26 10:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-09-25 4:30 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-25 11:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-20 5:01 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-20 22:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-01-27 1:53 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-27 9:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-10 2:31 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-10 12:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-11-10 15:48 ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-11 12:27 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-28 4:51 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-28 5:11 ` Ming Lei
2011-09-28 13:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-28 14:47 ` Ming Lei
2011-09-28 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-29 1:32 ` Ming Lei
2011-09-29 9:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-29 9:32 ` Ming Lei
2011-09-29 20:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-28 14:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-19 13:47 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-19 21:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2125012.dsI546JiDj@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.