From: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@amd.com>
Cc: "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Replace all AMD_CPPC_* macros with masks
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:46:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21250cdb-e398-448c-be08-e9b3778b3771@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250206215659.3350066-8-superm1@kernel.org>
On 2/7/2025 3:26 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>
> Bitfield masks are easier to follow and less error prone.
Looks good to me, just one suggestion below, apart from that,
Reviewed-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 18 +++++++++---------
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 16 ++++++----------
> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 3eadc4d5de837..f77335ebae981 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -700,15 +700,15 @@
> #define MSR_AMD_CPPC_REQ 0xc00102b3
> #define MSR_AMD_CPPC_STATUS 0xc00102b4
>
> -#define AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(x) (((x) >> 0) & 0xff)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF(x) (((x) >> 8) & 0xff)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF(x) (((x) >> 16) & 0xff)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(x) (((x) >> 24) & 0xff)
> -
> -#define AMD_CPPC_MAX_PERF(x) (((x) & 0xff) << 0)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_MIN_PERF(x) (((x) & 0xff) << 8)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_DES_PERF(x) (((x) & 0xff) << 16)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_ENERGY_PERF_PREF(x) (((x) & 0xff) << 24)
> +#define AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
How about AMD_CPPC_"CAP"_LOWEST_PERF_MASK and
> +#define AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
> +#define AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
> +#define AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_MASK GENMASK(31, 24)
> +
> +#define AMD_CPPC_MAX_PERF_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
AMD_CPPC_"REQ"_MAX_PERF_MASK, just to indicate these fields
belong to which register? But we can keep it as is, if you think it
would be a mouthful, I'll leave it upto you.
Thanks,
Dhananjay
> +#define AMD_CPPC_MIN_PERF_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
> +#define AMD_CPPC_DES_PERF_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
> +#define AMD_CPPC_EPP_PERF_MASK GENMASK(31, 24)
>
> /* AMD Performance Counter Global Status and Control MSRs */
> #define MSR_AMD64_PERF_CNTR_GLOBAL_STATUS 0xc0000300
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c
> index d745dd586303c..d68a4cb0168fa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cppc.c
> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ int amd_get_highest_perf(unsigned int cpu, u32 *highest_perf)
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> - val = AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(val);
> + val = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_MASK, val);
> } else {
> ret = cppc_get_highest_perf(cpu, &val);
> if (ret)
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> index adaa62fb2b04e..2595faa492bf1 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut.c
> @@ -158,10 +158,10 @@ static void amd_pstate_ut_check_perf(u32 index)
> return;
> }
>
> - highest_perf = AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(cap1);
> - nominal_perf = AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF(cap1);
> - lowest_nonlinear_perf = AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF(cap1);
> - lowest_perf = AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(cap1);
> + highest_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> + nominal_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> + lowest_nonlinear_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> + lowest_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> }
>
> if (highest_perf != READ_ONCE(cpudata->perf.highest_perf) &&
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> index 71636bd9884c8..cd96443fc117f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c
> @@ -89,11 +89,6 @@ static bool cppc_enabled;
> static bool amd_pstate_prefcore = true;
> static struct quirk_entry *quirks;
>
> -#define AMD_CPPC_MAX_PERF_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_MIN_PERF_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_DES_PERF_MASK GENMASK(23, 16)
> -#define AMD_CPPC_EPP_PERF_MASK GENMASK(31, 24)
> -
> /*
> * AMD Energy Preference Performance (EPP)
> * The EPP is used in the CCLK DPM controller to drive
> @@ -445,12 +440,13 @@ static int msr_init_perf(struct amd_cpudata *cpudata)
>
> perf.highest_perf = numerator;
> perf.max_limit_perf = numerator;
> - perf.min_limit_perf = AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(cap1);
> - perf.nominal_perf = AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF(cap1);
> - perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf = AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF(cap1);
> - perf.lowest_perf = AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF(cap1);
> + perf.min_limit_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> + perf.nominal_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_NOMINAL_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> + perf.lowest_nonlinear_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_LOWNONLIN_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> + perf.lowest_perf = FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_LOWEST_PERF_MASK, cap1);
> WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->perf, perf);
> - WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking, AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF(cap1));
> + WRITE_ONCE(cpudata->prefcore_ranking, FIELD_GET(AMD_CPPC_HIGHEST_PERF_MASK, cap1));
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 21:56 [PATCH 00/14] amd-pstate cleanups Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 01/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Show a warning when a CPU fails to setup Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 11:59 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-10 13:50 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2025-02-10 15:13 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 02/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop min and max cached frequencies Mario Limonciello
2025-02-07 10:44 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-07 16:15 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 03/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move perf values into a union Mario Limonciello
2025-02-10 13:38 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 22:14 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12 6:31 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-12 22:03 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 04/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Overhaul locking Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 5:02 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 21:54 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12 5:15 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-12 22:05 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 05/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop `cppc_cap1_cached` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 5:46 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 06/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Use _free macro to free put policy Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 5:58 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 07/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Replace all AMD_CPPC_* macros with masks Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 6:16 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar [this message]
2025-02-11 18:31 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 08/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cache CPPC request in shared mem case too Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 9:18 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 09/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Move all EPP tracing into *_update_perf and *_set_epp functions Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12 6:39 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 10/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Update cppc_req_cached for shared mem EPP writes Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:01 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 11/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Drop debug statements for policy setting Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:03 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 12/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Cache a pointer to policy in cpudata Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:13 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-11 19:17 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-02-12 3:52 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 13/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Rework CPPC enabling Mario Limonciello
2025-02-13 4:42 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2025-02-06 21:56 ` [PATCH 14/14] cpufreq/amd-pstate: Stop caching EPP Mario Limonciello
2025-02-11 13:27 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21250cdb-e398-448c-be08-e9b3778b3771@amd.com \
--to=dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
--cc=superm1@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.