From: Krystian Kaniewski <krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+b0aebd03565f5774f7f8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fat: skip rename rollback on buffers with failed I/O
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 10:21:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <213005bd-d502-4843-8b04-71fbd8ee2685@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bj90m6dq.fsf@mail.parknet.co.jp>
On 10/11/26 20:36, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Krystian Kaniewski <krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Is this trying to revert as many as possible even if partial? If so, it
> would not help actually, and complex. Maybe we can give up whole if
> partially revert?
>
> Thanks.
Yes, v2 tried to roll back every part that did not share the buffer with
the failed write. I agree that this may only produce a partial rollback
once the rename has progressed past a failed ".." update or old-entry
removal, and the alias tracking makes the error path too complex.
I have reworked this for v3. After either of those failures, the code now
gives up the on-disk rollback entirely, restores only the in-memory state,
reports filesystem corruption through fat_fs_error(), and returns the
original error.
The remaining on-disk recovery is limited to an earlier inode-position
write failure, before any ".." update or old-entry removal. At that point
a complete rollback is still possible by rereading the retained new-entry
buffer or reacquiring the entry buffer through inode writeback. For
RENAME_EXCHANGE, both position restorations are attempted because stopping
after the first failed restoration can leave both names pointing to the
same inode.
Thanks for the suggestion. I have tried to address it in v3 and will send
the revised patch shortly.
--
Krystian Kaniewski
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 16:38 [syzbot] [exfat?] WARNING in vfat_update_dotdot_de syzbot
2026-09-29 9:00 ` [PATCH] fat: validate dotdot buffers in VFAT and MSDOS rename and rollback Krystian Kaniewski
2026-09-30 8:02 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2026-09-30 12:17 ` Krystian Kaniewski
2026-10-02 13:43 ` [PATCH v2] fat: skip rename rollback on buffers with failed I/O Krystian Kaniewski
2026-10-11 18:36 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2026-10-14 8:21 ` Krystian Kaniewski [this message]
2026-10-14 8:23 ` [PATCH v3] fat: make rename recovery safe after metadata write errors Krystian Kaniewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=213005bd-d502-4843-8b04-71fbd8ee2685@gmail.com \
--to=krystianmkaniewski@gmail.com \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+b0aebd03565f5774f7f8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.