From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2]doc:Add performance test guide about how to get DPDK high perf on Intel platform Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:01:06 +0200 Message-ID: <2130384.etnPeQ8t8i@xps13> References: <1439435979-25869-1-git-send-email-qian.q.xu@intel.com> <2724688.VL6zfsszk2@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "Mcnamara, John" Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8225902 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:02:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so69448601wic.0 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 06:02:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-09-16 10:43, Mcnamara, John: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/doc/guides/perf_test_guide/index.rst > > > > Why creating a new guide? > > Can it be included as a chapter of the Linux user guide? > > I think the subject is probably distinct enough to merit its own > guide and it is more of an advanced topic than a getting started topic. I think we should avoid creating too many guides. This chapter is about using DPDK in Linux. Yes it is a bit more advanced than the Linux QSG. So why not creating an advanced section?