Re: [PATCH 1.6.1] don't inline rte_string_fns

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

Hi,

I have some minor comments below.

27/02/2014 09:18, Stephen Hemminger :
> The function rte_snprintf() can never be inlined by Gcc.
> If compiled with -Winline it generates an error:
>  function ‘rte_snprintf’ can never be inlined because it uses variable
> argument lists [-Werror=inline]
> 
> Therefore since both rte_snprintf and rte_strsplit are not performance
> sensitive just move them to being real functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen-OTpzqLSitTUnbdJkjeBofR2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_string_fns.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
> +/*-
> + *   BSD LICENSE
> + *
> + *   Copyright(c) 2010-2013 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.

It is now 2014 in version 1.6.0.

[...]

> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdarg.h>
> +#include <stddef.h>
> +#include <errno.h>

I think stddef.h is not needed.
 
[...]

> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_string_fns.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_string_fns.h
> @@ -47,7 +47,6 @@ extern "C" {
>  #include <stdio.h>
>  #include <stdarg.h>
>  #include <stddef.h>
> -#include <errno.h>
 
stdarg and stddef are not needed.
 
[...]

> +int
> +rte_snprintf(char *buffer, int buflen, const char *format, ...);
> 
> 

One blank line should be sufficient.

> +int
>  rte_strsplit(char *string, int stringlen,

Thank you
-- 
Thomas