From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>,
Quentin Schulz <foss+uboot@0leil.net>,
u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>,
Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@cherry.de>,
Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>,
Suniel Mahesh <sunil@amarulasolutions.com>,
Klaus Goger <klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com>,
jonas@kwiboo.se, u-boot@lists.denx.de,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] rockchip: px30: migrate to common bss and stack addresses + UART fixes for evb-px30
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 14:14:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2148002.OBFZWjSADL@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c9a78f7a-5b63-4d37-93d4-2c6bd8db0076@cherry.de>
Am Mittwoch, 22. Mai 2024, 10:39:25 CEST schrieb Quentin Schulz:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 5/21/24 8:04 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 07:39:53PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> >> PX30 Ringneck ran out of memory in the allocation pool of U-Boot proper
> >> pre-reloc. Something needed to be done. Jonas did migrate a few SoCs
> >> already to this common bss+stack addresses so it made sense to follow
> >> the same route for one additional SoC: PX30.
> >>
> >> While at it, also fix a few issues related to UART on the PX30 Mini EVB
> >> I could test.
> >>
> >> Boot (to U-Boot CLI) tested on PX30 Ringneck and PX30 Mini-EVB.
> >>
> >> Thanks to Jonas for hinting where to look at.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@cherry.de>
> >> ---
> >> Quentin Schulz (10):
> >> rockchip: px30: default TPL_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to 0x600 on PX30 Kconfig level
> >> rockchip: Use common bss and stack addresses on PX30
> >> rockchip: ringneck_px30: Use common bss and stack addresses
> >> rockchip: evb-px30: Use common bss and stack addresses
> >> rockchip: firefly-px30: Use common bss and stack addresses
> >> rockchip: odroid-go2: Use common bss and stack addresses
> >> rockchip: px30-core-*: Use common bss and stack addresses
> >> rockchip: px30: make UART pinmux accessible to TPL/SPL DTB
> >> rockchip: evb-px30: do not remove pinctrl nodes from SPL DTB
> >> rockchip: evb-px30: make UART5 the debug UART
> >>
> >> arch/arm/dts/px30-u-boot.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> >> arch/arm/mach-rockchip/px30/Kconfig | 8 +++++++-
> >> configs/evb-px30_defconfig | 23 +++++------------------
> >> configs/firefly-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> >> configs/odroid-go2_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> >> configs/px30-core-ctouch2-of10-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> >> configs/px30-core-ctouch2-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> >> configs/px30-core-edimm2.2-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> >> configs/ringneck-px30_defconfig | 19 +++----------------
> >> 9 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 115 deletions(-)
> >> ---
> >> base-commit: a7f0154c412859323396111dd0c09dbafbc153cb
> >> change-id: 20240521-px30-2024-07-rc-7136f6241d29
> >
> > As I assume we want to fix the platforms for v2024.07, is this the level
> > of config changes everyone is comfortable with on the platforms? Or
> > should we just go with the minimum for release and the rest to -next?
> >
>
> I can tell you that Ringneck doesn't work anymore on v2024.07-rc, but
> the PX30 Mini EVB was still reaching U-Boot CLI without the changes. I
> don't know about the other boards.
>
> So I could split this into two series, one for master, one for next.
>
> I could suggest: patch 1 to 3 in master, the rest in next. Patch 1 is
> just moving things around. Patch 2 is doing nothing if nobody uses
> ROCKCHIP_COMMON_STACK_ADDR and SPL_SHARES_INIT_SP_ADDR (which is the
> case for px30 boards). Patch 3 is for fixing Ringneck, which I know is
> broken.
>
> Heiko having access to the Odroid Go2, maybe he could test without my
> patches and see if it reaches the CLI to know if we should pull it in
> for master as well.
I did that yesterday evening. The Odroid Go2 also reached u-boot CLI
and also booted without these changes. So I guess it's small enough
or whatever.
So at least the Go2 is fine on 2024.07-rc3 either way with or without
this series.
Heiko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-22 12:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-21 17:39 [PATCH 00/10] rockchip: px30: migrate to common bss and stack addresses + UART fixes for evb-px30 Quentin Schulz
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 01/10] rockchip: px30: default TPL_SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN to 0x600 on PX30 Kconfig level Quentin Schulz
2024-05-21 20:22 ` Heiko Stübner
2024-05-23 3:48 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 02/10] rockchip: Use common bss and stack addresses on PX30 Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:48 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 03/10] rockchip: ringneck_px30: Use common bss and stack addresses Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:48 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 04/10] rockchip: evb-px30: " Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:48 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 05/10] rockchip: firefly-px30: " Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:48 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:39 ` [PATCH 06/10] rockchip: odroid-go2: " Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:48 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:40 ` [PATCH 07/10] rockchip: px30-core-*: " Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:48 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:40 ` [PATCH 08/10] rockchip: px30: make UART pinmux accessible to TPL/SPL DTB Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:49 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:40 ` [PATCH 09/10] rockchip: evb-px30: do not remove pinctrl nodes from SPL DTB Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:49 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 17:40 ` [PATCH 10/10] rockchip: evb-px30: make UART5 the debug UART Quentin Schulz
2024-05-23 3:49 ` Kever Yang
2024-05-21 18:04 ` [PATCH 00/10] rockchip: px30: migrate to common bss and stack addresses + UART fixes for evb-px30 Tom Rini
2024-05-22 8:39 ` Quentin Schulz
2024-05-22 12:14 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2024-05-22 14:15 ` Tom Rini
2024-05-21 19:16 ` Heiko Stübner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2148002.OBFZWjSADL@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=foss+uboot@0leil.net \
--cc=heiko.stuebner@cherry.de \
--cc=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
--cc=klaus.goger@theobroma-systems.com \
--cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
--cc=quentin.schulz@cherry.de \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=sunil@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.