Re: [Qemu-devel] vmdk: improve streamOptimized vmdk support

[devsk <internet_everyone@yahoo.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2531 bytes --]

Fam: Any updates on this?
Thanks 


     On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 12:54 AM, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com> wrote:
   

 On Tue, 03/03 09:36, Milos Vyletel wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Sunil Kumar <internet_everyone@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Any update on this Milos?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> 
> I did look at this yesterday and unfortunately it will be harder to
> adapt to new head as previously thought. Since the addition of
> next_cluster_sector (which is one of last Fam's comments in v3)
> writing to vmdk's revolve around sectors instead of offset and that
> does not work very well with streamOptimized format.
> 
> I'm sorry but I don't think I'll have enough time to spend in near
> future to get this properly working. Plus I no longer have the test
> environment since I've changed jobs in the meantime.

I'll see if I can roll some patches later. :)

Sunil, do you have an environment to run the tests later?

Fam

> 
> Milos
> 
> >
> >
> > On Monday, February 23, 2015 5:50 AM, Milos Vyletel <milos.vyletel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Am 23.02.2015 um 09:10 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> >>> Perhaps Fam (cc'ed) can help you.
> >>>
> >>> Sunil Kumar <internet_everyone@yahoo.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > I ran into an issue where the OVA created from the VMDK file created
> >>> > by qemu-img is rejected by vSphere with a message like "Not a
> >>> > supported disk format (sparse VMDK too old)". I was looking through
> >>> > the archives and found this:
> >>> >
> >>> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-08/msg01028.html
> >>> >
> >>> > That's exactly my issue and the patch will resolve it. But this patch
> >>> > has not been merged yet and it does not apply on top of 2.2.0
> >>> > cleanly. Any ideas what happened to the patch there?
> >>
> >> Fam had review comments in the mailing list thread that you refer to
> >> above, so it seems we're still waiting for a v4 patch by Milos that
> >> addresses the issues Fam found.
> >>
> >> Milos, are you still interested in this patch or should someone else
> >> pick it up?
> >>
> >
> > Oh, shame on me. I've completely forgot about this. I did quickly
> > ported the patch to current upstream and did some basic testing.
> > Something is little bit off so I will have to figure that out as well
> > as look at Fam's comments and I will post v4 asap. I hope to find some
> > time to look at this properly this week.
> >
> >
> > Milos



   

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5629 bytes --]