From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
hvaibhav@ti.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com>,
mchehab@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] omap_vout: remove cpu_is_* uses
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 17:39:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2148719.6v36XORg4e@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121129162927.GF5312@atomide.com>
Hi Tony,
On Thursday 29 November 2012 08:29:27 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> [121129 01:37]:
> > On Thursday 29 November 2012 11:30:28 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > On 2012-11-28 17:13, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Monday 12 November 2012 15:33:38 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> This patch removes use of cpu_is_* funcs from omap_vout, and uses
> > > >> omapdss's version instead. The other patch removes an unneeded
> > > >> plat/dma.h include.
> > > >>
> > > >> These are based on current omapdss master branch, which has the
> > > >> omapdss version code. The omapdss version code is queued for v3.8.
> > > >> I'm not sure which is the best way to handle these patches due to the
> > > >> dependency to omapdss. The easiest option is to merge these for 3.9.
> > > >>
> > > >> There's still the OMAP DMA use in omap_vout_vrfb.c, which is the last
> > > >> OMAP dependency in the omap_vout driver. I'm not going to touch that,
> > > >> as it doesn't look as trivial as this cpu_is_* removal, and I don't
> > > >> have much knowledge of the omap_vout driver.
> > > >>
> > > >> Compiled, but not tested.
> > > >
> > > > Tested on a Beagleboard-xM.
> > > >
> > > > Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> > > > Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > > The patches depend on unmerged OMAP DSS patches. Would you like to
> > > > push this series through linuxtv or through your DSS tree ? The later
> > > > might be easier, depending on when the required DSS patches will hit
> > > > mainline.
> > >
> > > The DSS patches will be merged for 3.8. I can take this via the omapdss
> > > tree, as there probably won't be any conflicts with other v4l2 stuff.
> > >
> > > Or, we can just delay these until 3.9. These patches remove omap
> > > platform dependencies, helping the effort to get common ARM kernel.
> > > However, as there's still the VRFB code in the omap_vout driver, the
> > > dependency remains. Thus, in way, these patches alone don't help
> > > anything, and we could delay these for 3.9 and hope that
> > > omap_vout_vrfb.c gets converted also for that merge window.
> >
> > OK, I'll queue them for v3.9 then.
>
> Please rather queue the cpu_is_omap removal to v3.8 so I can
> remove plat/cpu.h for omap2+.
In that case the patches should go through the DSS tree. Mauro, are you fine
with that ?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-29 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-12 13:33 [PATCH 0/2] omap_vout: remove cpu_is_* uses Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-12 13:33 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] [media] omap_vout: use omapdss's version instead of cpu_is_* Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-12 13:33 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-12 13:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] [media] omap_vout: remove extra include Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-12 13:33 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-12 17:37 ` [PATCH 0/2] omap_vout: remove cpu_is_* uses Tony Lindgren
2012-11-28 15:13 ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-11-29 9:30 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-29 9:30 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-29 9:36 ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-11-29 16:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-11-29 16:39 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2012-11-29 17:05 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2012-11-29 17:08 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-11-29 17:08 ` Tomi Valkeinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2148719.6v36XORg4e@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=archit@ti.com \
--cc=hvaibhav@ti.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.