Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] malloc: cleanup coding style

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>]

12/11/2020 14:41, wangyunjian:
> From: Burakov, Anatoly [mailto:anatoly.burakov@intel.com]
> > On 12-Nov-20 9:31 AM, wangyunjian wrote:
> > > From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> > >
> > > Cleanup code style issue reported by kernel checkpatch. As follows:
> > >    * ERROR:CODE_INDENT: code indent should use tabs where possible
> > >    * ERROR:SPACING: spaces required around that '?' (ctx:VxE)
> > >    * WARNING:INDENTED_LABEL: labels should not be indented
> > >
> > > Fixes: b0489e7bca2f ("malloc: fix linear complexity")
> > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_elem.c
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_elem.c
> > > @@ -391,14 +391,14 @@ malloc_elem_free_list_index(size_t size)
> > >   		return 0;
> > >
> > >   	/* Find next power of 2 >= size. */
> > > -	log2 = sizeof(size) * 8 - __builtin_clzl(size-1);
> > > +	log2 = sizeof(size) * 8 - __builtin_clzl(size - 1);
> > >
> > >   	/* Compute freelist index, based on log2(size). */
> > >   	index = (log2 - MALLOC_MINSIZE_LOG2 +
> > MALLOC_LOG2_INCREMENT - 1) /
> > > -	        MALLOC_LOG2_INCREMENT;
> > > +		MALLOC_LOG2_INCREMENT;
> > 
> > Here and below, I believe we usually add two indents to the continuation
> > line, to avoid confusing with things like if statements.
> 
> It is already two indents in the patch. Please double check?

No it is two indents from the beginning of the line,
while Anatoly was asking for double additional indent.

> > With that fixed,

I fix it.

> > Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>

Applied, thanks