From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: r10kindsofpeople <r10kindsofpeople@gmail.com>
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: 9.0.1 release tarball requires bitbake 1.19.1 but provides 1.18.0?
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 16:09:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2173803.768kMi5SBz@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPhnLPBanJ=CHZdzAwGNriUOH5UeNn-CggWntNbML8gw+6_V_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 19 July 2013 07:52:03 Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 6:07 AM, r10kindsofpeople
> <r10kindsofpeople@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've run into another issue when trying to upgrade my system from Denzil
> > to Dylan using the released packages. I extracted the 9.0.1 released
> > tarball, added the crownbay BSP, then moved my layers over from Denzil.
> > Sourced the build directory, then modified bblayers.conf and local.conf to
> > merge my specifics with the new formats.
> >
> > 'bitbake core-image-minimal' results in an error... "OE-core's config
> > sanity checker detected a potential misconfiguration." and "Bitbake
> > version 1.19.1 is required and version 1.18.0 was found".
> >
> > A contributing factor may be that I also have a git snapshot from 2 days
> > ago on the same system (that builds), but I've tried to keep them in
> > separate directories and be careful about running the source script in
> > it's own shell.
> >
> > Is this a problem with the release tarball or a PICNIC problem?
>
> It shouldn't be a problem with the tarball as the download tarball is
>
> http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/releases/yocto/yocto-1.4.1/poky-73f103bf9b
> 2cdf985464dc53bf4f1cfd71d4531f.tar.bz2
>
> which corresponds with the tagged release at:
>
> http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/?h=dylan&id=73f103bf9b
> 2cdf985464dc53bf4f1cfd71d4531f
>
> I just validated the tarball and can't reproduce so my guess is that
> this is probably a dirty env issue.
It does sound that way. John, you haven't perhaps changed the path to the
metadata but re-used the build directory, such that BBLAYERS in bblayers.conf
still points to the development snapshot?
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-19 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-19 13:07 9.0.1 release tarball requires bitbake 1.19.1 but provides 1.18.0? r10kindsofpeople
2013-07-19 14:52 ` Flanagan, Elizabeth
2013-07-19 15:09 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
2013-07-19 16:43 ` r10kindsofpeople
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2173803.768kMi5SBz@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=r10kindsofpeople@gmail.com \
--cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.