All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.29.6 - 2.6.35-rc3] CRED: Release spinlock before commit_creds().
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 16:45:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21796.1276875943@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201006180308.o5I38O34094551@www262.sakura.ne.jp>


Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:

> reparent_to_kthreadd() is calling commit_creds() with tasklist_lock held.
> But commit_creds() calls
> key_fsuid_changed()/key_fsgid_changed()/proc_id_connector() which may sleep.
> Release tasklist_lock before calling commit_creds().

Hmmm...  Does this change leave a hole in which the thread can be accessed as
it's not locked away, but still has the old credentials?

I wonder if we should have an internal CLONE_KTHREAD flag to achieve this in
do_fork() rather than daemonize()'ing the thread later.

Also, key_fsuid_changed() and key_fsgid_changed() should be skipped in
commit_creds() if the thread-keyring pointer in the new creds is not the same
as that in the old creds (as will be the case if we're shifting to init_cred),
so they shouldn't really be a problem.

However, I can't see an easy way around proc_id_connector() sleeping - unless
we just don't call it if new == &init_cred in commit_creds().

I suppose it also leaves a hole if we call commit_creds() first, before
getting the write_lock()... :-/

David

      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-18 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-18  3:08 [PATCH 2.6.29.6 - 2.6.35-rc3] CRED: Release spinlock before commit_creds() Tetsuo Handa
2010-06-18  3:40 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-06-18 15:45 ` David Howells [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21796.1276875943@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.