Re: lib: include rte_memory.h for __rte_cache_aligned

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]

2014-12-11 09:17, Neil Horman:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 01:36:54AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Hi Neil,
> > 
> > 2014-12-10 19:28, Neil Horman:
> > > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 07:09:03PM +0000, Jia Yu wrote:
> > > > Hi Neil,
> > > > 
> > > > Moving __rte_cache_aligned right after struct keyword will help. On the
> > > > other hand, enforcing this rule for existing (100+) and future definitions
> > > > will be difficult. It¹s clearer and a good practice to include header file
> > > > explicitly.
> > > > 
> > > You need to include the header file regardless of what you do.  The advantage to
> > > placing the macro right after the struct keyword is that failure to include the
> > > header will result in a compiler error, rather than silent behavioral changes
> > > and run time breakage.
> > > 
> > > You don't have to enforce putting the attribute after the struct keyword, I'd
> > > say just move them now to protect the current code.  Subsequent patch authors
> > > will see the existing style and follow suit.  Or they won't, and we'll point out
> > > the issue during review.
> > 
> > It should be a different patch for next release cycle.
> > Let's apply this fix only for 1.8.0.
> > 
> Why?  Theres no harm in doing so now.

It's a coding style good practice, not a bug fix.
We are now integrating only bug fixes and docs.
We have to put a limit to avoid last minutes bugs.

-- 
Thomas