From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Michal Kobylinski <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] examples: update to use new lpm lib for ipv4
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 01:45:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2184990.3GvJWPVT2Q@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457470323-26368-3-git-send-email-michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>
2016-03-08 21:52, Michal Kobylinski:
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kobylinski <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>
> Acked-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
> ---
> examples/ip_fragmentation/main.c | 16 ++++++------
> examples/ip_reassembly/main.c | 15 +++++------
> examples/l3fwd-power/main.c | 2 +-
> examples/l3fwd-vf/main.c | 2 +-
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_sse.h | 2 +-
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.h | 6 ++---
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_sse.h | 24 ++++++++++--------
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_sse.h | 8 +++---
> examples/load_balancer/runtime.c | 2 +-
> examples/performance-thread/l3fwd-thread/main.c | 33 ++++++++++++++-----------
I get this error:
examples/performance-thread/l3fwd-thread/main.c:1354:26: error:
use of undeclared identifier 'next_hop'
About the patch format:
- v3 is missing in the title
- it should follow the v2 thread with --in-reply-to
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-09 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 20:52 [PATCH v3 0/2] Increased number of next hops for LPM IPv4 Michal Kobylinski
2016-03-08 20:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] lpm: extended ipv4 next_hop field Michal Kobylinski
2016-03-08 20:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] examples: update to use new lpm lib for ipv4 Michal Kobylinski
2016-03-09 0:45 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-03-09 0:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Increased number of next hops for LPM IPv4 Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-09 9:28 ` Kobylinski, MichalX
2016-03-09 12:40 ` [PATCH v4] lpm: extended ipv4 next_hop field Michal Jastrzebski
2016-03-09 13:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-09 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] Increased number of next hops for LPM IPv4 Michal Jastrzebski
2016-03-09 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] lpm: extended ipv4 next_hop field Michal Jastrzebski
2016-03-09 16:57 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] lpm: added a new rte_lpm_config structure for ipv4 Michal Jastrzebski
2016-03-09 22:09 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] Increased number of next hops for LPM IPv4 Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2184990.3GvJWPVT2Q@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=michalx.kobylinski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.