Re: [git pull] vfs.git sysv pile

["Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>]

On giovedì 2 marzo 2023 23:35:41 CET Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 07:35:59PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 12:31:46PM +0100, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > > But... when yesterday Al showed his demo patchset I probably interpreted
> > > his
> > > reply the wrong way and thought that since he spent time for the demo he
> > > wanted to put this to completion on his own.
> > > 
> > > Now I see that you are interpreting his message as an invite to use them
> > > to
> > > shorten the time...
> > > 
> > > Furthermore I'm not sure about how I should credit him. Should I merely
> > > add a
> > > "Suggested-by:" tag or more consistent "Co-authored-by: Al Viro <...>"?
> > > Since
> > > he did so much I'd rather the second but I need his permission.
> > 
> > What, for sysv part?  It's already in mainline; for minixfs and ufs, if 
you
> > want to do those - whatever you want, I'd probably go for "modeled after
> > sysv series in 6.2" - "Suggested-by" in those would suffice...
> > 
> > > @Al,
> > > 
> > > Can I really proceed with *your* work? What should the better suited tag
> > > be to credit you for the patches?
> > > 
> > > If you can reply today or at least by Friday, I'll pick your demo
> > > patchset,
> > > put it to completion, make the patches and test them with (x)fstests on 
a
> > > QEMU/KVM x86_32 bit VM, with 6GB RAM, running an HIGHMEM64GB enabled
> > > kernel.
> > 
> > Frankly, ext2 patchset had been more along the lines of "here's what
> > untangling the calling conventions in ext2 would probably look like" than
> > anything else. If you are willing to test (and review) that sucker and it
> > turns out to be OK, I'll be happy to slap your tested-by on those during
> > rebase and feed them to Jan...
> 
> PS: now we can actually turn
>         kunmap_local((void *)((unsigned long)page_addr & PAGE_MASK));
> into
> 	kunmap_local(page_addr);
> 
> provided that commit doing that includes something along the lines of
> 
> Do-Not-Backport-Without: 88d7b12068b9 "highmem: round down the address 
passed
> to kunmap_flush_on_unmap()"
> 
> in commit message.

I'll do it for fs/sysv.

Instead there is no need to change anything in my series for fs/ufs (it was  
made as if we already had 88d7b12068b9 "highmem: round down the address passed 
to kunmap_flush_on_unmap()" in place).

Thanks,

Fabio