From: "Petr Vandrovec" <VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz>
To: dalecki@evision.ag
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: IDE lockups with 2.5.28...
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 19:22:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <218BBF1744@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz> (raw)
Martin,
can you explain what local_irq_disable() in do_request in
drivers/ide/ide.c should guard against? There is dozen (all unless I
missed something) of paths which do not local_irq_enable(), and neither
does the caller...
And what you meant with (endless) loop in ide_do_request?
And where do_request() callers obtain channel lock so that do_request()
can release and reacquire it?
My problem is that fsck reliable dies between 79.6 and 81% of its
run - on UP machine with SMP kernel:
NMI detected lockup on CPU0 ...
Stack trace: do_request + 315/924
do_ide_request
generic_unplug_device
blk_run_queues
do_page_cache_readahead
page_cache_readahead
do_generic_file_read
generic_file_read
file_read_actor
vfs_read
sys_read
do_request+315 is clear_bit(IDE_BUSY, channel->active) at line 606.
The do_ide_request()'s loop
while (!test_and_set_bit(IDE_BUSY, ch->active)) {
do_request(ch)
}
looks very suspicious to me - it will loop here until the end of world,
as there is nothing in queue, so do_request() will always exit
with IDE_BUSY cleared.
Next question is: with this stack trace, where you obtained ch->lock,
so that do_request() can do call to spin_unlock(ch->lock) ? It looks
to me like that I should get 'unlocking unlocked spinlock' with
appropriate debug.
What (probably) happened is that hardware finished request before
spin_lock_irq(ch->lock) (at line 749) was executed, we quit with
IDE_BUSY cleared, and it was last thing we did... Maybe I should
go back to IDE-98?
Thanks,
Petr Vandrovec
vandrove@vc.cvut.cz
next reply other threads:[~2002-07-25 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-25 17:22 Petr Vandrovec [this message]
2002-07-26 2:09 ` IDE lockups with 2.5.28 Marcin Dalecki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-26 10:00 Petr Vandrovec
2002-07-26 10:30 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-26 10:30 Petr Vandrovec
2002-07-26 10:31 ` Marcin Dalecki
2002-07-26 10:46 Petr Vandrovec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=218BBF1744@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz \
--to=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
--cc=dalecki@evision.ag \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.