From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Turn of_match_node into a static inline when CONFIG_OF isn't set
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:17:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2194247.ngWdBSP92t@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140211180845.GG841@joshc.qualcomm.com>
Hi Josh,
On Tuesday 11 February 2014 12:08:46 Josh Cartwright wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 06:20:49PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 February 2014 10:48:26 Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:55:35PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 11 February 2014 08:41:08 Josh Cartwright wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:36:51PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> [..]
>
> > > I am a bit weary about having an of_match_node() user that both directly
> > > dereferences the result (i.e. of_match_node(matches, np)->data) _and_
> > > builds when !CONFIG_OF; most likely due to a traumatic childhood event
> > > where demons flew out my nose.
> >
> > I can assign the intermediate value to a variable before dereferencing it
> > and drop my of_match_node() patch if it makes everybody happier.
>
> Assuming you also intend to handle the case of_match_node() may return
> NULL, or otherwise prevent the execution of this codepath when
> !CONFIG_OF, then, yes, that sounds good.
I'll condition the call of that function to IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF), yes.
> It sure would be convenient if platform_device had a 'const struct
> of_device_id *of_id_entry' member similar to the existing struct
> platform_device_id one, that was set up during platform device matching.
> Most platform_driver users of of_match_node() would simply go away.
There's definitely room for improvement (although in this particular case the
driver handles an I2C device, not a platform device).
I've always been slightly bothered by the duplication of matching information
between native/legacy device IDs and OF device IDs. I haven't really given
this a thought though, but I believe something should be done.
I've just remembered that, in the I2C case, the I2C core selects the
appropriate i2c_device_id matching entry based on the compatible string,
provided that the i2c_device_id table matches the of_device_id table with I2C
device names set to the OF compatible string with the vendor prefix stripped
off. Just food for thought.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-11 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1392122211-11422-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart@ ideasonboard.com>
2014-02-11 12:36 ` [PATCH] of: Turn of_match_node into a static inline when CONFIG_OF isn't set Laurent Pinchart
[not found] ` <1392122211-11422-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-11 14:41 ` Josh Cartwright
2014-02-11 14:41 ` Josh Cartwright
2014-02-11 14:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-02-11 16:48 ` Josh Cartwright
[not found] ` <20140211164825.GC841-OP5zVEFNDbfdOxZ39nK119BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-11 17:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-02-11 17:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-02-11 18:08 ` Josh Cartwright
[not found] ` <20140211180845.GG841-OP5zVEFNDbfdOxZ39nK119BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-11 18:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-02-11 18:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-02-11 20:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-12 21:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
[not found] ` <CAMuHMdVOkUMxEkUK70Y=Y126XmqgKMpyqmGRG5us7vZPhP8WNw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-13 1:01 ` Josh Cartwright
2014-02-13 1:01 ` Josh Cartwright
[not found] ` <CAMuHMdVkPLe5986hYPApoQr7oJSb6U2P71=nP+9mtvtaskdHXg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-11 21:30 ` Rob Herring
2014-02-11 21:30 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqKnsr-9nSjCGvroC0nDK36vQUnwMWj=cPjvUbRymmHFOQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-11 21:55 ` Josh Cartwright
2014-02-11 21:55 ` Josh Cartwright
[not found] ` <20140211215519.GJ841-OP5zVEFNDbfdOxZ39nK119BPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-11 23:14 ` Rob Herring
2014-02-11 23:14 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqJdbBuv0TgN7Okrxa4MmEon6a74hv458VFS=8RpcyX5tw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-12 2:15 ` Josh Cartwright
2014-02-12 2:15 ` Josh Cartwright
2014-02-11 19:17 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2014-02-17 18:19 ` Grant Likely
2014-02-17 18:19 ` Grant Likely
2014-02-17 18:18 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <20140217181829.B5F80C40372-WNowdnHR2B42iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-17 19:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-02-17 19:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2194247.ngWdBSP92t@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=joshc@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.