From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dropping librte_ivshmem
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:34:25 +0200
Message-ID: <2195337.EI94ugUIUk@xps13>
References: <1465481396-23968-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
 <1679257.PTMOF8o7eO@xps13> <57619B6C.8080408@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
 David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>, dev@dpdk.org,
 sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com, kevin.traynor@intel.com, pmatilai@redhat.com
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-lf0-f42.google.com (mail-lf0-f42.google.com
 [209.85.215.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92853C12C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 20:34:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf0-f42.google.com with SMTP id l188so22928201lfe.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:34:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <57619B6C.8080408@intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2016-06-15 19:16, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 6/9/2016 10:26 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > So this is my proposal:
> > Someone start working on the above cleanup now, otherwise the whole
> > rte_ivshmem feature will be deprecated in 16.07 and removed in 16.11.
> 
> I would like to note that at least SPP (soft patch panel) is using
> rte_ivshmem feature.

Why?
Can SPP work without ivshmem?