Re: [meta-virtulization] [PATCH] irqbalance: Uprev to 1.0.6

[Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>]

On Tuesday 27 August 2013 09:32:24 David Nyström wrote:
> On Mon 26 Aug 2013 11:27:30 PM CEST, Yang Shi wrote:
> > Add recipe for 1.0.6 version. And, add status and reload commands into
> > init script.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@windriver.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >   ...irqbalance-Add-status-and-reload-commands.patch |   55
> >   ++++++++++++++++++++ recipes-extended/irqbalance/irqbalance_1.0.6.bb   
> >   |   15 +++++
> >   2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >   create mode 100644
> >   recipes-extended/irqbalance/irqbalance/irqbalance-Add-status-and-reload
> >   -commands.patch create mode 100644
> >   recipes-extended/irqbalance/irqbalance_1.0.6.bb> 
> > diff --git
> > a/recipes-extended/irqbalance/irqbalance/irqbalance-Add-status-and-reload
> > -commands.patch
> > b/recipes-extended/irqbalance/irqbalance/irqbalance-Add-status-and-reload
> > -commands.patch new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..d853d0b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++
> > b/recipes-extended/irqbalance/irqbalance/irqbalance-Add-status-and-reload
> > -commands.patch @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
> > +From dc7366896dd5a5bae82be4b11530bc9fdb7cbcdd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > +From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@windriver.com>
> > +Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:58:02 -0700
> > +Subject: [PATCH] irqbalance: Add status and reload commands
> > +
> > +Add status and reload commands for irqbalanced init script
> > +
> > +Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@windriver.com>
> > +---
> > + irqbalance.init |   12 +++++++++---
> > + 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > +
> > +diff --git a/irqbalance.init b/irqbalance.init
> > +index d12d62c..f58bf55 100644
> > +--- a/irqbalance.init
> > ++++ b/irqbalance.init
> > +@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> > + #!/bin/sh
> > + #
> > +-# Copyright (c) 2012 Wind River Systems, Inc.
> > ++# Copyright (c) 2013 Wind River Systems, Inc
> 
> What is this ?, as far as I understand it, the script + recipe is
> proprietary licensed to windriver.
> 
> I see the windriver copyright notice was introduced with commit:
> 43b438f06897a390e16709b3f9e11355f325e2e9
> I seem to remember that we agreed that all contents of
> meta-virtualization should be MIT.

I'm not a lawyer, but as far as I am aware MIT licensing does not preclude 
having a copyright owner; in fact the standard form of the MIT license text 
begins with a copyright statement.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre