From: Ganesh <ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>, npiggin@gmail.com
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/mce: Fix mce handler and add selftest
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:19:02 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <219931ea-ea22-2979-d447-fd5366bb7d6f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917122920.GR29778@kitsune.suse.cz>
On 9/17/20 5:59 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:52:25PM +0530, Ganesh Goudar wrote:
>> This patch series fixes mce handling for pseries, provides debugfs
>> interface for mce injection and adds selftest to test mce handling
>> on pseries/powernv machines running in hash mmu mode.
>> debugfs interface and sleftest are added only for slb multihit
>> injection, We can add other tests in future if possible.
>>
>> Ganesh Goudar (3):
>> powerpc/mce: remove nmi_enter/exit from real mode handler
>> powerpc/mce: Add debugfs interface to inject MCE
>> selftest/powerpc: Add slb multihit selftest
> Is the below logic sound? It does not agree with what is added here:
>
> void machine_check_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> int recover = 0;
>
> /*
> * BOOK3S_64 does not call this handler as a non-maskable interrupt
> * (it uses its own early real-mode handler to handle the MCE proper
> * and then raises irq_work to call this handler when interrupts are
> * enabled).
> *
> * This is silly. The BOOK3S_64 should just call a different function
> * rather than expecting semantics to magically change. Something
> * like 'non_nmi_machine_check_exception()', perhaps?
> */
> const bool nmi = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64);
>
> if (nmi) nmi_enter();
>
> Thanks
>
> Michal
Looks like Nick Piggin has the Justification for it, Ill leave Nick to
answer this.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-18 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-16 17:22 [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/mce: Fix mce handler and add selftest Ganesh Goudar
2020-09-16 17:22 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/mce: remove nmi_enter/exit from real mode handler Ganesh Goudar
2020-09-17 12:20 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-09-18 12:04 ` Ganesh
2020-09-16 17:22 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/mce: Add debugfs interface to inject MCE Ganesh Goudar
2020-09-17 8:24 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-17 8:24 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-17 8:36 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-17 8:36 ` kernel test robot
2020-09-17 12:23 ` Michal Suchánek
2020-09-18 12:06 ` Ganesh
2020-09-18 6:40 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-09-18 12:07 ` Ganesh
2020-09-16 17:22 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftest/powerpc: Add slb multihit selftest Ganesh Goudar
2020-09-17 12:29 ` [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/mce: Fix mce handler and add selftest Michal Suchánek
2020-09-18 11:49 ` Ganesh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=219931ea-ea22-2979-d447-fd5366bb7d6f@linux.ibm.com \
--to=ganeshgr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.