From: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] gpio: ep93xx: Fix single irqchip with multi gpiochips
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:54:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2202252.ElGaqSPkdT@redslave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VeW6EWrGPbzBrSPry9Lb8GDvA-C-mkCvmJMTVPeeVxjKg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, 9 February 2021 15:46:19 MSK Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 2:35 PM Nikita Shubin
<nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> wrote:
>> On Monday, 8 February 2021 16:20:17 MSK Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> >On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:00 AM Nikita Shubin
>>
>> <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me> wrote:
>...
>
>> >> +static void ep93xx_init_irq_chip(struct device *dev, struct
>> >> irq_chip
>> >> *ic, const char *label) +{
>> >>
>> >> + ic->name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "gpio-irq-%s",
>> >> label);
>> >
>> >Is the label being NULL okay?
You mean ENOMEM should be honored ? I think you are right about it.
>>
>> The label is taken from ep93xx_gpio_banks[], so unless we explicitly
>> pass zero to ep93xx_init_irq_chip(), we are ok.
>
>Maybe I was unclear, let me rephrase: Is the *resulting* label being
>NULL okay?
>> >> + ic->irq_ack = ep93xx_gpio_irq_ack;
>> >> + ic->irq_mask_ack = ep93xx_gpio_irq_mask_ack;
>> >> + ic->irq_mask = ep93xx_gpio_irq_mask;
>> >> + ic->irq_unmask = ep93xx_gpio_irq_unmask;
>> >> + ic->irq_set_type = ep93xx_gpio_irq_type;
>> >> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-09 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 8:59 [PATCH v5 0/7] gpio: ep93xx: fixes series patch Nikita Shubin
2021-02-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] gpio: ep93xx: fix BUG_ON port F usage Nikita Shubin
2021-02-08 15:43 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-02-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] gpio: ep93xx: Fix single irqchip with multi gpiochips Nikita Shubin
2021-02-08 13:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-09 12:33 ` Nikita Shubin
2021-02-09 12:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-09 12:54 ` Nikita Shubin [this message]
2021-02-09 13:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-08 15:48 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2021-02-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] gpio: ep93xx: Fix wrong irq numbers in port F Nikita Shubin
2021-02-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] gpio: ep93xx: drop to_irq binding Nikita Shubin
2021-02-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] gpio: ep93xx: Fix typo s/hierarchial/hierarchical Nikita Shubin
2021-02-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] gpio: ep93xx: refactor ep93xx_gpio_add_bank Nikita Shubin
2021-02-08 8:59 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] gpio: ep93xx: refactor base IRQ number Nikita Shubin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2202252.ElGaqSPkdT@redslave \
--to=nikita.shubin@maquefel.me \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.