All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
To: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] config: return an empty list, not NULL
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 21:18:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <220927.86k05oy5oi.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b85d8a43-6640-aa9c-3103-0c3d43c2a479@github.com>


On Tue, Sep 27 2022, Derrick Stolee wrote:

> On 9/27/2022 12:21 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 27 2022, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
>
>>>  /**
>>>   * Finds and returns the value list, sorted in order of increasing priority
>>>   * for the configuration variable `key`. When the configuration variable
>>> - * `key` is not found, returns NULL. The caller should not free or modify
>>> - * the returned pointer, as it is owned by the cache.
>>> + * `key` is not found, returns an empty list. The caller should not free or
>>> + * modify the returned pointer, as it is owned by the cache.
>>>   */
>>>  const struct string_list *git_config_get_value_multi(const char *key);
>> 
>> Aside from the "DWIM API" aspect of this (which I don't mind) I think
>> this is really taking the low-level function in the wrong direction, and
>> that we should just add a new simple wrapper instead.
>> 
>> I.e. both the pre-image API docs & this series gloss over the fact that
>> we'd not just return NULL here if the config wasn't there, but also if
>> git_config_parse_key() failed.
>> 
>> So it seems to me that a better direction would be starting with
>> something like the WIP below (which doesn't compile the whole code, I
>> stopped at config.[ch] and pack-bitmap.c). I.e. the same "int" return
>> and "dest" pattern that most other things in the config API have.
>
> Do you have an example where a caller would benefit from this
> distinction? Without such an example, I don't think it is worth
> creating such a huge change for purity's sake alone.

Not initially, I started poking at this because the CL/series/commits
says that we don't care about the case of non-existing keys, without
being clear as to why we want to conflate that with other errors we
might get from this API.

But after some digging I found:

	$ for k in a a.b. "'x.y"; do ./git for-each-repo --config=$k;  echo $?; done
	error: key does not contain a section: a
	0
	error: key does not contain variable name: a.b.
	0
	error: invalid key: 'x.y
	0
	
I.e. the repo_config_get_value_multi() you added in for-each-repo
doesn't distinguish between bad keys and non-existing keys, and returns
0 even though it printed an "error".

> I'm pretty happy that the diff for this series is an overall
> reduction in code, while also not being too large in the interim:
>
>  12 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> If all callers that use the *_multi() methods would only use the
> wrapper, then what is the point of doing the low-level manipulations?

I hacked up something that's at least RFC-quality based on this
approach, but CI is running etc., so not submitting it
now:

	https://github.com/git/git/compare/master...avar:git:avar/have-git_configset_get_value-use-dest-and-int-pattern

I think the resulting diff is more idiomatic API use, i.e. you ended up
with:

	        /* submodule.active is set */
	        sl = repo_config_get_value_multi(repo, "submodule.active");
	-       if (sl) {
	+       if (sl && sl->nr) {

But I ended up doing:

	        /* submodule.active is set */
	-       sl = repo_config_get_value_multi(repo, "submodule.active");
	-       if (sl) {
	+       if (!repo_config_get_const_value_multi(repo, "submodule.active", &sl)) {

Note the "const" in the function name, i.e. there's wrappers that handle
the case where we have a hardcoded key name, in which case we can BUG()
out if we'd return < 0, so all we have left is just "does key exist".

In any case, I'm all for having some simple wrapper for the common cases.

But I didn't find a single case where we actually needed this "never
give me a non-NULL list" behavior, it could just be generalized to
"let's have the API tell us if the key exist".

If you use the non-"const" API you can distinguish the err < 0 case, so
for-each-repo can now error out appropriately:

	$ ./git for-each-repo --config=a; echo $?
	error: key does not contain a section: a
	fatal: got bad config --config=a
	
	usage: git for-each-repo --config=<config> <command-args>
	
	    --config <config>     config key storing a list of repository paths
	
	129

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-27 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-27 14:08 [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] config API: return empty list, not NULL Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-09-27 14:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] config: relax requirements on multi-value return Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-09-27 17:26   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-09-27 14:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] *: relax git_configset_get_value_multi result Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-09-28 15:58   ` Taylor Blau
2022-09-27 14:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] config: add BUG() statement instead of possible segfault Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-09-27 16:17   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-09-27 16:46     ` Derrick Stolee
2022-09-27 17:22       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-09-27 14:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] config: return an empty list, not NULL Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-09-27 16:21   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-09-27 16:50     ` Derrick Stolee
2022-09-27 19:18       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [this message]
2022-09-28 13:46         ` Derrick Stolee
2022-09-28 14:37           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-09-28 18:10             ` Derrick Stolee
2022-09-28 19:33               ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-09-27 14:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] *: expect a non-NULL list of config values Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2022-09-28  2:40 ` [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] config API: return empty list, not NULL Junio C Hamano
2022-09-28 18:38   ` Derrick Stolee
2022-09-28 19:27     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=220927.86k05oy5oi.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com \
    --to=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.