From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: kvm ivy bridge support? Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:54:30 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <223120064.18858337.1417798470544.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> References: <5480679E.20209@redhat.com> <20141204135605.6193305.66560.1954@tetrioncapital.com> <54807F62.5040709@redhat.com> <20141205013326.6193305.22486.2011@tetrioncapital.com> <54815ED9.2040702@redhat.com> <5481CE0A.2010809@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Lau , Yong Wang , kvm To: Rik van Riel Return-path: Received: from mx6-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.39]:34987 "EHLO mx6-phx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751208AbaLEQye (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:54:34 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5481CE0A.2010809@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rik van Riel" > To: "Thomas Lau" , "Paolo Bonzini" > Cc: "Yong Wang" , "kvm" > Sent: Friday, December 5, 2014 4:23:54 PM > Subject: Re: kvm ivy bridge support? > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 12/05/2014 03:17 AM, Thomas Lau wrote: > > virsh cpu-models x86_64 | sort > > ... > > Penryn SandyBridge Westmere > > ... > > > interesting that it doesn't have Ivy Bridge, any reason? > > The reason would be that you are running an older version. No, the reason could also be that for some reason we added Haswell and Broadwell, but forgot Ivy Bridge. I'll send QEMU patches next week. Paolo