From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wp216.webpack.hosteurope.de ([80.237.132.223]:53149 "EHLO wp216.webpack.hosteurope.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751086AbcCOXvH convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 19:51:07 -0400 From: Andreas Grosse To: Anand Jain Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Incompat features: raid56 ... when creating a RAID6? Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:51:02 +0100 Message-ID: <2241137.7FlY2XkjWK@andilaptop> In-Reply-To: <56E88A7C.1010801@oracle.com> References: <16570443.SxVegaKaET@andilaptop> <56E88A7C.1010801@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Mittwoch, 16. März 2016, 06:19:40 CET schrieben Sie: > Those messages are indeed confusing. It just indicates the > FS may fail to mount on certain older kernels. Not necessarily > the kernel in the system on which you ran btrfs-progs. Sorry > that it not very obvious at the moment, but there are patches > to make this part better. > > To check features that your running kernel supports you could use > ls /sys/fs/btrfs/features > > But note: Some of the names used by sys/fs/..features don't > exactly match with the names used by btrfs-progs: incompatible.. > (a bug, which is also fixed in the patch). > > Thanks, Anand Hello Anand, thanks for the detailed reply. Good to hear, those things are already patched. I thought that I could not be the only one who misunderstood "Incompat". Thanks for the hint with the sys-files! Andi One more question: Any idea what happened here? Did I send this garbage? This was at the very end of your response mail... > > (If important: Gentoo Linux with kernel 4.5.0, btrfs-progs v4.4.1) > > > > AndiN‹§²æìr¸›yúèšØb²X¬¶Ç§vØ^–)Þº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±nÚß²)í…æèw*jg¬±¨¶‰šŽŠÝ¢j/êäz > > ¹Þ–Šà2ŠÞ™¨è­Ú&¢)ß¡«a¶Úþø®G«éh®æj:+v‰¨Šwè†Ù¥