From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: gem-cma: Fix warnings due to improper printk formats Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:13:07 +0200 Message-ID: <22528895.LMMYMFopKm@avalon> References: <1393956617-10616-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> <1736665.yCifit6oSM@avalon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com (perceval.ideasonboard.com [95.142.166.194]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701DE6EA78 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 15:11:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: Dave Airlie Cc: dri-devel List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Hi Dave, On Friday 04 April 2014 08:01:15 Dave Airlie wrote: > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > Could you please take this patch in your tree ? > > > > What's the expected process when sending patches to the mailing list by > > the way ? Do you track them somehow, or always expect pull requests ? > > I generally pick up things with reviewed tags if I can, other stuff I > pick up in cycles from patchwork, but since patchwork is mostly > unmaintained sometimes things fall through the cracks, > > so pull reqs of reviewed patches generally always win, but for fixes > like this I don't mind pull reqs if they've hit the list and haven't > cause much discussion. Thank you for the clarification. I assume you'll take this one manually, I'll send pull requests in the future. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart