From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, mhalcrow@us.ibm.com,
phillip@hellewell.homeip.net, sfrench@samba.org
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 3/5] afs: new aops
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:57:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22543.1195055866@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071114151825.GA20973@wotan.suse.de>
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> In core code, the PAGE_CACHE_SIZE is for page cache struct pages. Single
> struct pages (not page arrays). Take a look at generic mapping read or
> something.
So you're saying a struct page controls an area of PAGE_CACHE_SIZE, not an
area of PAGE_SIZE? Is a struct page then a purely pagecache concept?
> Documentation is the opposite of convention ;)
If it's not Documented, then it's irrelevant.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-14 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-12 7:12 [rfc][patches] remove ->prepare_write Nick Piggin
2007-11-12 7:13 ` [rfc][patch 1/5] ecryptfs new aops Nick Piggin
2007-11-12 7:14 ` [rfc][patch 2/5] cifs: " Nick Piggin
2007-11-12 7:14 ` [rfc][patch 3/5] afs: " Nick Piggin
2007-11-12 15:29 ` David Howells
2007-11-13 0:15 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-13 0:30 ` David Howells
2007-11-13 0:44 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-13 10:56 ` David Howells
2007-11-14 4:24 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 12:18 ` David Howells
2007-11-14 15:18 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 15:57 ` David Howells [this message]
2007-11-14 21:32 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-15 12:15 ` David Howells
2007-11-15 21:37 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-12 7:20 ` [rfc][patch 4/5] rd: rewrite rd Nick Piggin
2007-11-12 7:23 ` [rfc][patch 5/5] remove prepare_write Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22543.1195055866@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhalcrow@us.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=phillip@hellewell.homeip.net \
--cc=sfrench@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.