From: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>
To: "HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)" <erik_habbinga@hp.com>,
"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: re: Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:24:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22920000.997799084@tiny> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F341E03C8ED6D311805E00902761278C04728E71@xfc04.fc.hp.com>
On Monday, August 13, 2001 09:40:59 AM -0700 "HABBINGA,ERIK
(HP-Loveland,ex1)" <erik_habbinga@hp.com> wrote:
> Here are some SPEC SFS NFS testing (http://www.spec.org/osg/sfs97) results
> I've been doing over the past few weeks that shows NFS performance
> degrading since the 2.4.5pre1 kernel. I've kept the hardware constant,
> only changing the kernel.
Did the 2.4.5pre1 have the transaction tracking patch?
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-14 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-13 16:40 Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this) HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)
2001-08-13 21:12 ` Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results show this) Hans Reiser
2001-08-14 7:57 ` Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2001-08-14 14:24 ` Chris Mason [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-08-14 15:04 Performance 2.4.8 is worse than 2.4.x<8 (SPEC NFS results sho w this) HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)
2001-08-15 16:42 HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)
2001-08-15 21:14 HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)
2001-08-17 16:14 HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)
2001-08-31 15:47 HABBINGA,ERIK (HP-Loveland,ex1)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22920000.997799084@tiny \
--to=mason@suse.com \
--cc=erik_habbinga@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.