From: "Kohli, Gaurav" <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com,
kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: oom: Fix race condition between oom_badness and do_exit of task
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 10:21:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22ebd655-ece4-37e5-5a98-e9750cb20665@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803071254410.165297@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On 3/8/2018 2:26 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
>> index 6fd9773..5f4cc4b 100644
>> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
>> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
>> @@ -114,9 +114,11 @@ struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p)
>>
>> for_each_thread(p, t) {
>> task_lock(t);
>> + get_task_struct(t);
>> if (likely(t->mm))
>> goto found;
>> task_unlock(t);
>> + put_task_struct(t);
>> }
>> t = NULL;
>> found:
> We hold rcu_read_lock() here, so perhaps only do get_task_struct() before
> doing rcu_read_unlock() and we have a non-NULL t?
Here rcu_read_lock will not help, as our task may change due to below algo:
for_each_thread(p, t) {
task_lock(t);
+ get_task_struct(t);
if (likely(t->mm))
goto found;
task_unlock(t);
+ put_task_struct(t)
So only we can increase usage counter here only at the current task.
I have seen you new patch, that seems valid to me and it will resolve our issue.
Thanks for support.
Regards
Gaurav
>
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-08 4:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-07 12:57 [PATCH] mm: oom: Fix race condition between oom_badness and do_exit of task Gaurav Kohli
2018-03-07 12:57 ` Gaurav Kohli
2018-03-07 20:56 ` David Rientjes
2018-03-07 20:56 ` David Rientjes
2018-03-08 4:51 ` Kohli, Gaurav [this message]
2018-03-08 14:05 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-03-08 14:05 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-03-09 7:11 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-03-09 10:48 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-03-09 12:04 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-03-09 12:18 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-03-13 13:37 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22ebd655-ece4-37e5-5a98-e9750cb20665@codeaurora.org \
--to=gkohli@codeaurora.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.