From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Simplify handling the single-bpp case during state computation
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 18:02:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22ebd87c-22d7-488a-a2e0-a482995def96@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aBndpioCdsEEcmRq@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com>
On 5/6/2025 3:30 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 03:21:13PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
>> On 4/28/2025 7:01 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
>>> A follow-up change wants to skip invalid bpps in the bpp select loop of
>>> a stream state computation. To allow for that, using the usual
>>> 'continue' statement in the loop, change the way the sinlge-bpp range is
>>
>> s/sinlge/single
>>
>>
>>> handled.
>>>
>>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 10 ++++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>>> index 49b836cd8816c..d8033e55dc093 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
>>> @@ -283,6 +283,12 @@ int intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>> fxp_q4_to_frac(max_bpp_x16) ||
>>> fxp_q4_to_frac(bpp_step_x16)));
>>> + if (!bpp_step_x16) {
>>> + /* Allow using zero step only to indicate single try for a given bpp. */
>>> + drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, min_bpp_x16 != max_bpp_x16);
>>> + bpp_step_x16 = 1;
>>> + }
>> I can see this function is called for non-dsc uhbr case with bpp_step_x16 =0
>> and dsc false.
>>
>> So we just want to get the loop run once and get the slots with min_bpp_x16
>> == max_bpp_x16 == fxp_q4_from_int(pipe_bpp) right?
>>
>> Similarly for dsc uhbr case check with a given compressed bpp dsc_bpp_x16 if
>> its valid.
>>
>> bpp_step_x16 = 1 will mean 1/16th fraction. The value itself won't have any
>> effect for the case where min_bpp_x16 == max_bpp_x16.
>>
>> Is my understanding correct here?
> Yes, correct. On SST UHBR for each bpp a minimal link config is
> selected, so this function - checking if the link config is valid - is
> called for a single bpp only, hence min_bpp_x16 == max_bpp_x16.
Thanks for the confirmation.
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ankit
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> if (is_mst) {
>>> mst_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, &intel_dp->mst.mgr);
>>> if (IS_ERR(mst_state))
>>> @@ -408,10 +414,6 @@ int intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> -
>>> - /* Allow using zero step to indicate one try */
>>> - if (!bpp_step_x16)
>>> - break;
>>> }
>>> if (slots < 0) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-28 13:31 [PATCH v2 00/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Add support for fractional link bpps Imre Deak
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Use the correct connector while computing the link BPP limit on MST Imre Deak
2025-05-06 8:45 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-06 9:39 ` Luca Coelho
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Simplify handling the single-bpp case during state computation Imre Deak
2025-05-06 9:51 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-06 10:00 ` Imre Deak
2025-05-06 12:32 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2025-05-06 9:53 ` Luca Coelho
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Validate compressed bpp vs. platform restrictions Imre Deak
2025-05-06 9:54 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-06 10:03 ` Luca Coelho
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Update the total link slot count early Imre Deak
2025-05-06 9:55 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-06 10:07 ` Luca Coelho
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Check BW limit on the local MST link early Imre Deak
2025-05-06 10:06 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Simplify computing the min/max compressed bpp limits Imre Deak
2025-05-06 10:11 ` Luca Coelho
2025-05-06 10:16 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] drm/i915/dp: Limit max link bpp properly to a fractional value on SST Imre Deak
2025-05-06 10:27 ` Luca Coelho
2025-05-06 12:34 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Add support for fractional compressed link bpps on MST Imre Deak
2025-05-06 13:02 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] drm/i915/display: Factor out intel_display_{min, max}_pipe_bpp() Imre Deak
2025-05-06 13:07 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-06 15:16 ` Imre Deak
2025-05-07 3:59 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-07 10:58 ` Imre Deak
2025-05-07 12:44 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] drm/i915/dp: Export intel_dp_dsc_min_src_compressed_bpp() Imre Deak
2025-05-06 13:16 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] drm/i915: Add support for forcing the link bpp on a connector Imre Deak
2025-05-07 5:37 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-05-07 12:03 ` Imre Deak
2025-05-07 12:41 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:31 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] drm/i915/dp_mst: Enable fractional link bpps on MST if the bpp is forced Imre Deak
2025-05-06 13:15 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-04-28 13:59 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/dp_mst: Add support for fractional link bpps (rev2) Patchwork
2025-04-28 13:59 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-28 14:00 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-04-28 14:09 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-04-28 14:11 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-04-28 14:12 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-28 17:03 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-04-28 17:21 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning " Patchwork
2025-04-28 18:00 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-05-07 14:09 ` Imre Deak
2025-05-08 11:46 ` Ravali, JupallyX
2025-04-28 18:01 ` Patchwork
2025-04-28 18:01 ` Patchwork
2025-04-28 18:02 ` Patchwork
2025-04-28 18:02 ` Patchwork
2025-04-28 18:03 ` Patchwork
2025-04-28 18:03 ` Patchwork
2025-04-28 18:03 ` Patchwork
2025-04-28 18:03 ` Patchwork
2025-04-28 18:04 ` Patchwork
2025-04-28 18:05 ` Patchwork
2025-04-28 18:05 ` Patchwork
2025-04-28 18:06 ` Patchwork
2025-04-28 18:06 ` Patchwork
2025-04-28 18:06 ` Patchwork
2025-05-06 8:37 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-05-08 14:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915/dp_mst: Add support for fractional link bpps (rev3) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22ebd87c-22d7-488a-a2e0-a482995def96@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.