All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] V4L2: add CCF support to the v4l2_clk API
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 13:59:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2303897.CzDnkeNcGb@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1501021247590.30761@axis700.grange>

Hi Guennadi,

Thank you for the patch. I like the approach.

On Friday 02 January 2015 12:48:43 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> V4L2 clocks, e.g. used by camera sensors for their master clock, do not
> have to be supplied by a different V4L2 driver, they can also be
> supplied by an independent source. In this case the standart kernel
> clock API should be used to handle such clocks. This patch adds support
> for such cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
> ---
>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-clk.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  include/media/v4l2-clk.h           |  2 +
>  2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-clk.c
> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-clk.c index c210906..693e5a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-clk.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>   */
> 
>  #include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
>  #include <linux/list.h>
> @@ -39,9 +40,24 @@ static struct v4l2_clk *v4l2_clk_find(const char *dev_id,
> const char *id) return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>  }
> 
> +static int v4l2_clk_add(struct v4l2_clk *clk, const char *dev_id,
> +			const char *id)
> +{
> +	mutex_lock(&clk_lock);
> +	if (!IS_ERR(v4l2_clk_find(dev_id, id))) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&clk_lock);
> +		return -EEXIST;
> +	}
> +	list_add_tail(&clk->list, &clk_list);
> +	mutex_unlock(&clk_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  struct v4l2_clk *v4l2_clk_get(struct device *dev, const char *id)
>  {
>  	struct v4l2_clk *clk;
> +	struct clk *ccf_clk = clk_get(dev, id);
> 
>  	mutex_lock(&clk_lock);
>  	clk = v4l2_clk_find(dev_name(dev), id);
> @@ -50,6 +66,22 @@ struct v4l2_clk *v4l2_clk_get(struct device *dev, const
> char *id) atomic_inc(&clk->use_count);
>  	mutex_unlock(&clk_lock);

Shouldn't we start by CCF and then fall back to V4L2 clocks ?

> +	if (!IS_ERR(ccf_clk) && IS_ERR(clk)) {
> +		/* not yet on the list */
> +		clk = kzalloc(sizeof(struct v4l2_clk), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (clk)
> +			clk->id = kstrdup(id, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (!clk || !clk->id) {
> +			kfree(clk);
> +			clk_put(ccf_clk);
> +			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +		}
> +		clk->clk = ccf_clk;
> +		atomic_set(&clk->use_count, 1);
> +
> +		v4l2_clk_add(clk, dev_name(dev), id);

I don't think there's a need to add this clock to the clk_list. As all 
operations are delegated to CCF, and as CCF implements proper refcounting, we 
can just create one v4l2_clk wrapper instance for every call to 
v4l2_clk_get().

> +	}
> +
>  	return clk;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(v4l2_clk_get);
> @@ -67,6 +99,15 @@ void v4l2_clk_put(struct v4l2_clk *clk)
>  		if (tmp == clk)
>  			atomic_dec(&clk->use_count);
> 
> +	if (clk->clk) {
> +		clk_put(clk->clk);
> +		if (!atomic_read(&clk->use_count)) {
> +			list_del(&clk->list);
> +			kfree(clk->id);
> +			kfree(clk);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	mutex_unlock(&clk_lock);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(v4l2_clk_put);
> @@ -98,8 +139,12 @@ static void v4l2_clk_unlock_driver(struct v4l2_clk *clk)
> 
>  int v4l2_clk_enable(struct v4l2_clk *clk)
>  {
> -	int ret = v4l2_clk_lock_driver(clk);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (clk->clk)
> +		return clk_enable(clk->clk);
> 
> +	ret = v4l2_clk_lock_driver(clk);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
> 
> @@ -125,6 +170,9 @@ void v4l2_clk_disable(struct v4l2_clk *clk)
>  {
>  	int enable;
> 
> +	if (clk->clk)
> +		return clk_disable(clk->clk);
> +
>  	mutex_lock(&clk->lock);
> 
>  	enable = --clk->enable;
> @@ -142,8 +190,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(v4l2_clk_disable);
> 
>  unsigned long v4l2_clk_get_rate(struct v4l2_clk *clk)
>  {
> -	int ret = v4l2_clk_lock_driver(clk);
> +	int ret;
> 
> +	if (clk->clk)
> +		return clk_get_rate(clk->clk);
> +
> +	ret = v4l2_clk_lock_driver(clk);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
> 
> @@ -162,7 +214,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(v4l2_clk_get_rate);
> 
>  int v4l2_clk_set_rate(struct v4l2_clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
>  {
> -	int ret = v4l2_clk_lock_driver(clk);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (clk->clk) {
> +		long r = clk_round_rate(clk->clk, rate);
> +		if (r < 0)
> +			return r;
> +		return clk_set_rate(clk->clk, r);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = v4l2_clk_lock_driver(clk);
> 
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -204,14 +265,9 @@ struct v4l2_clk *v4l2_clk_register(const struct
> v4l2_clk_ops *ops, atomic_set(&clk->use_count, 0);
>  	mutex_init(&clk->lock);
> 
> -	mutex_lock(&clk_lock);
> -	if (!IS_ERR(v4l2_clk_find(dev_id, NULL))) {
> -		mutex_unlock(&clk_lock);
> -		ret = -EEXIST;
> +	ret = v4l2_clk_add(clk, dev_id, NULL);
> +	if (ret < 0)
>  		goto eexist;
> -	}
> -	list_add_tail(&clk->list, &clk_list);
> -	mutex_unlock(&clk_lock);
> 
>  	return clk;
> 
> diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-clk.h b/include/media/v4l2-clk.h
> index 8f06967..4402b2d 100644
> --- a/include/media/v4l2-clk.h
> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-clk.h
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>  struct module;
>  struct device;
> 
> +struct clk;
>  struct v4l2_clk {
>  	struct list_head list;
>  	const struct v4l2_clk_ops *ops;
> @@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ struct v4l2_clk {
>  	int enable;
>  	struct mutex lock; /* Protect the enable count */
>  	atomic_t use_count;
> +	struct clk *clk;
>  	void *priv;
>  };

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-02 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-02 11:48 [PATCH 0/2] V4L2: add CCF support to v4l2_clk Guennadi Liakhovetski
2015-01-02 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] V4L: remove clock name from v4l2_clk API Guennadi Liakhovetski
2015-01-05  8:56   ` Josh Wu
2015-01-05  9:28     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2015-01-05 10:27       ` Josh Wu
2015-01-06  8:29   ` Josh Wu
2015-01-06 22:17     ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2015-01-07  2:16       ` Josh Wu
2015-01-07  2:16       ` Josh Wu
2015-01-08 22:37         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2015-01-08 22:47           ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-12  9:14             ` Josh Wu
2015-01-12 10:38               ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-14 10:35                 ` Josh Wu
2015-01-02 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] V4L2: add CCF support to the " Guennadi Liakhovetski
2015-01-02 11:59   ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2015-01-02 20:18     ` [PATCH v2 " Guennadi Liakhovetski
2015-01-04 11:23       ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-04 16:45         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2015-01-04 21:48           ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-01-05  9:11       ` Josh Wu
2015-01-05  9:36         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2015-01-05 10:00           ` Josh Wu
2015-01-04  9:59 ` [PATCH 0/2] V4L2: add CCF support to v4l2_clk Josh Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2303897.CzDnkeNcGb@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=josh.wu@atmel.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.