From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com, burn@swtf.dyndns.org
Subject: Re: Are the writing of an events records to audit.log atomic should a log rotation occur
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:32:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23054651.VinVpYuuhG@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359762689.3612.11.camel@swtf>
On Saturday, February 02, 2013 10:51:29 AM Burn Alting wrote:
> All,
>
> When rotating log files due a USR1 signal being sent, or for any other
> reason, does auditd finish writing all the
> records that belong to the current event being written before starting
> the new log file?
When it catches SIGUSR1, it sets a flag that is read by the event loop. So,
this serializes it with other events. It does write the record out before
rotating.
> That is, will I find records belonging to a single event in two log
> files?
That is a different question and a different answer. Events can be composed of
multiple records. It is possible for a record to be emitted and at that time a
check of the disk space used or file size may cause a rotation or some other
action.
> If this is the case, would there be problems if auditd was changed to
> wait and 'flush' all an event's records before
> rotating?
Auditd just writes to disk. It does not try to determine if anything is
pending because its in a race to dequeue as fast as possible before buffers fill
up. Any re-assembly of records into an event is done by aureport and ausearch.
> One assumes auditd-event.c would need to be modified to be
> more event aware. Perhaps make use of AUDIT_EOE or
> other means of identifying the end of an event or a single event.
It might be helpful to describe the problem this is solving.
Thanks,
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-04 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-01 23:51 Are the writing of an events records to audit.log atomic should a log rotation occur Burn Alting
2013-02-04 19:32 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2013-02-04 20:51 ` Burn Alting
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23054651.VinVpYuuhG@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=burn@swtf.dyndns.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.