From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ROuSC-0006q8-Nf for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:59:48 +0100 Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2011 08:53:18 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="74180184" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.143]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2011 08:53:17 -0800 From: Paul Eggleton To: David Thomas Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:53:16 +0000 Message-ID: <2307753.9BlijQWh4O@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.7.2 (Linux/3.0.0-12-generic-pae; KDE/4.7.2; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1580580.FyEQSKQZzU@helios> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: SRC_URI = "svn://svn.o-hand.com/repos/matchbox/trunk X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:59:49 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Friday 11 November 2011 10:34:56 you wrote: > http://www.compulab.co.il/workspace/mediawiki/index.php5/CM-T3530:_Linux:_Bu > ilding_images > > Bad Idea? Well, that's a positively ancient revision of OE (from 2009) and having to put a set of patches on top of it is rather ugly. It's not clear to me why they couldn't just point you to a revision with the appropriate support already in it if they wanted to pick a stable point. It'll be dependent on what the patches do, but I think you'll probably be much better off with the OE 2011.03-maintenance branch or master (in the latter case you'll need to use DISTRO = "angstrom-2010.x" since there is no 2008.1, that's why I was asking previously) - both of which have a cm-t35 machine, but I can't speak to how good the support for it will be. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre